2016
DOI: 10.1515/9781474414890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gilles Deleuze's Transcendental Empiricism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucial to this ontology, which Deleuze himself calls "materialist vitalism" (Deleuze, 1995: 143;Bell, 2009: 17), is the affirmation of hylozoism (Adkins, 2015: 3). Rejecting any implications of a "transcendent" center, this approach revolves around a particular kind of "transcendental empiricism," where the transcendental dimension is actually "immanent" in the world (Bryant, 2008;Rölli, 2016). Along with this immanentist ontology comes a form of univocity (Smith, 2012: 27-42) in which a univocal and immanent being is common to all things, unlike bivocal conceptions of Being, such as the monotheistic God, which is traditionally thought of as standing beyond the myriad things.…”
Section: The In-corporeal Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucial to this ontology, which Deleuze himself calls "materialist vitalism" (Deleuze, 1995: 143;Bell, 2009: 17), is the affirmation of hylozoism (Adkins, 2015: 3). Rejecting any implications of a "transcendent" center, this approach revolves around a particular kind of "transcendental empiricism," where the transcendental dimension is actually "immanent" in the world (Bryant, 2008;Rölli, 2016). Along with this immanentist ontology comes a form of univocity (Smith, 2012: 27-42) in which a univocal and immanent being is common to all things, unlike bivocal conceptions of Being, such as the monotheistic God, which is traditionally thought of as standing beyond the myriad things.…”
Section: The In-corporeal Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 Rölli (2016) offered some reassurance here when stating that isolating a new concept from others might “disquiet a major referential system enough so as eventually to pave the way to letting a quite different plane become visible” (p. 223). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%