2021
DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2021.1971252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical tomography as a tool to estimate the geometry of soil layers: relevance for the reliability assessment of dikes

Abstract: The geometric variability of soil layers is a large source of uncertainty in the reliability assessment of dikes. Because direct samples of the subsurface soils are often insufficient to capture the complexity of the subsurface, geophysical methods provide a powerful source of complementary information. A combined approach to estimate the geometry of soil layers is presented. The approach combines local point data, i.e. data obtained from a CPT or a borehole log, and geophysical tomography in a universal cokri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical imagery is often affected by a lack of resolution, and the geometry of interfaces is directly estimated by these methods, which inherently lack accuracy. In addition to EMI and ERT, results of geotechnical investigations, e.g., Cone Penetration Test (CPT), core sampling and borehole drilling logs, should be used to directly identify interfaces between soil layers [35].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling: Example Of Results and Comments On Hydra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical imagery is often affected by a lack of resolution, and the geometry of interfaces is directly estimated by these methods, which inherently lack accuracy. In addition to EMI and ERT, results of geotechnical investigations, e.g., Cone Penetration Test (CPT), core sampling and borehole drilling logs, should be used to directly identify interfaces between soil layers [35].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling: Example Of Results and Comments On Hydra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like conditioning on g point data, adding conditional probabilities to represent inter‐layer dependencies can result in more realistic dike buildup realizations. The use of recent developments in continuous geophysical data interpretation, such as electrical resistivity tomography (Chavez Olalla et al, 2021) or ground penetrating radar (Di Prinzio et al, 2010) are promising to increase the availability of ground truth data too. In addition, coupling our object‐based model to other geostatistical methods, such as multiple‐point geostatistics (Tahmasebi, 2018) can provide more detailed indications of material uncertainty across but also along the dike.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abandonment stage upper sands appear to have a higher percentage of admixture of silt‐sized grains (Supinfo S2) that regular point bar deposits have not, which would decrease their hydraulic conductivity. Experimental ERT geophysical measurements (Olalla et al ., 2021, their fig. 6) return relatively lower resistivity values in this part of cross‐section B (their BH2 is 2017 01 002 herein), which supports the deviating sedimentary characteristics of these sands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%