2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical site assessment in karst terrain: A case study from southwestern Missouri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Karst processes can result in large-scale voids -extensive fissures and cavernsand can lead to the creation of spongy or porous rocks. The natural consequence of karst is that the voids are filled with a mixture of fine rock grains and rock fragments from loose layers of overburden, which in turn is manifested by the occurrence of sinkholes and other forms of discontinuous deformations on the surface of the land [17][18][19].…”
Section: Karst Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karst processes can result in large-scale voids -extensive fissures and cavernsand can lead to the creation of spongy or porous rocks. The natural consequence of karst is that the voids are filled with a mixture of fine rock grains and rock fragments from loose layers of overburden, which in turn is manifested by the occurrence of sinkholes and other forms of discontinuous deformations on the surface of the land [17][18][19].…”
Section: Karst Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical approaches have also been used as alternative methods of investigation, with the advantage of reducing uncertainties related to superficial anthropogenic or natural modifications (Argentieri et al, 2015; Youssef et al, 2020). The material contrast between the sinkhole sediments and host rock (e.g., density, electrical resistivity, electrical permittivity) makes it possible to identify limits and underground geometries of pre‐existing karst, even in the absence of surface evidence (e.g., Kaufmann et al, 2014; Varnavina et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The huge variations in the measurable physical properties (by many orders of magnitude), the wide range of overlap and spatial heterogeneity in near-surface material makes geological interpretations quite arbitrary. Moreover, each geophysical method has certain advantages and limitations, (e.g., Varnavina et al., 2019 ; Pazzi et al., 2019 ). However, there are certain cases in which geophysicists are contended to reduce volume of work or urged to use only one geophysical technique for the purpose of cost minimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%