2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrically non-linear analysis of laminated composite structures using a 4-node co-rotational shell element with enhanced strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Basar,et al, 1993) solved this problem using a fully nonlinear formulation accounting for finite rotations along with higher order shear defamation theory. Our (FOSD FRT) results agree very well with those of (Basar, et al, 1993), (LRT56-Kreja, 2013) and (Kim,et al, 2007). On the other hand, the FOSD FRT solution differs from the other simplified nonlinear models LRT5 and MRT5.…”
Section: Fig2 Two Edges Hinged Composite Laminated Platesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Basar,et al, 1993) solved this problem using a fully nonlinear formulation accounting for finite rotations along with higher order shear defamation theory. Our (FOSD FRT) results agree very well with those of (Basar, et al, 1993), (LRT56-Kreja, 2013) and (Kim,et al, 2007). On the other hand, the FOSD FRT solution differs from the other simplified nonlinear models LRT5 and MRT5.…”
Section: Fig2 Two Edges Hinged Composite Laminated Platesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Due to the dual symmetry of the analyzed structure, a quarter of the plate is modeled. In Figure 3 the normalized transverse deflection is compared with the existing literature given by (LRT56-Kreja, 2013), (Kim, et al, 2007), (Kreja and Schmidt, 2006) (LRT5, MRT5) together with the reference solutions of (Reddy, 1990) and (Basar,et al, 1993).…”
Section: Asymmetric Cross-ply Laminated Plate Strip Under Uniformly Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3] Composite structures are generally orthotropic in nature, often showing unique response even under simple loading conditions and geometric con¯gurations, and thus present challenging technical problems in their modeling. 2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Computational theories for the modeling of composite shells can be categorized as: (i) classical laminated plate theory; [12][13][14] (ii)¯rst-order shear deformation laminated plate theory; 9,15-20 (iii) higher-order shear deformation laminated plate theories; 2,21-25 (iv) layer-wise theories; 2,26 and (v) zig-zag theories. [27][28][29][30] The number of unknown variables employed in the¯rst three theories are independent from the number of constitutive layers, thus they belong to equivalent single-layer theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assumedstrain Hu-Washizu variational framework was utilized[31]. Kim et al adopted the corotational formulation in combination with enhanced assumed strain and assumed natural strain methods to derive an improved 4-node shell element for nonlinear analysis[32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%