2022
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2021.2021289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography of disservices in urban forests: public participation mapping for closing the loop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents are spontaneous associating peri-urban forests with oxygen, health, relaxation, recreation or bird watching, similar associations being found by previous studies that showed that most frequently associations with the peri-urban forests are related to health, wellbeing and a good living, tourism, along with nature-centered experiences such as bird watching (Bjarstig & Stens 2018, Grima et al 2020, Beckmann-Wübbelt et al 2021, Baumeister et al 2022.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Respondents are spontaneous associating peri-urban forests with oxygen, health, relaxation, recreation or bird watching, similar associations being found by previous studies that showed that most frequently associations with the peri-urban forests are related to health, wellbeing and a good living, tourism, along with nature-centered experiences such as bird watching (Bjarstig & Stens 2018, Grima et al 2020, Beckmann-Wübbelt et al 2021, Baumeister et al 2022.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Si bien la condición antrópica es evidente, razón por la cual también se le asignaron valoraciones negativas en el mapa anterior (LVN), según los hallazgos resulta un punto donde coinciden los dos tipos de valoración, sobresale en este caso la referencia cultural al tratarse de un sitio icónico y turístico. En general en los tramos fluviales correspondientes a las áreas más densamente urbanizadas, encontramos zonas de confluencia de valores negativos como positivos, esto podría deberse en parte a que se trata de lugares céntricos, emblemáticos y patrimoniales, que además corresponde a la zona de mayor densidad urbana, donde el paisaje fluvial es más visible y accesible, probablemente donde la comunidad siente apego y familiaridad, y a la vez es donde convergen varias actividades; estos resultados son coherentes con estudios similares, donde tambien se presentan puntos donde convergen dintintos valores sociales, (Baumeister, Gerstenberg, Plieninger, & Schraml, 2022;Plieninger, Dijks, Oteros-Rozas, & Bieling, 2013a;Rodríguez-Morales et al, 2020).…”
Section: Lugares De Valor Positivo (Lvp)unclassified
“…Therefore, landscape values can be both positive and negative (García-Nieto et al, 2015;Milcu et al, 2013;Plieninger et al, 2013), although the latter is rarely considered in academic studies (Baumeister et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%