2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0016852109040049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodynamics of the northwestern sector of the pacific mobile belt in the Late Cretaceous-Early Paleogene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the scientific literature several versions of the origin of this base are put forward. A number of researchers believe that this is a separate West Kamchatka microcontinental block [32][33][34]. Others suggest that the West Kamchatka zone is part of the Sea of Okhotsk megablock [25, 26,35], which is supported by the authors of this article.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the scientific literature several versions of the origin of this base are put forward. A number of researchers believe that this is a separate West Kamchatka microcontinental block [32][33][34]. Others suggest that the West Kamchatka zone is part of the Sea of Okhotsk megablock [25, 26,35], which is supported by the authors of this article.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…1, a). Their formation is associated with the successive attachment of the Olyutorskaya and Kronotskaya island arcs, the displacement of the subduction zone towards the Pacific Ocean, and the formation of volcanic belts and forearc troughs, which are confidently mapped on various tectonic schemes [34,36]. These structures are contrasted in the potential fields (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These are exposed in a north‐south‐oriented 200‐km‐long and 30‐ to 40km‐wide zone in the southern part of the Sredinny Range (Figure ). The Sredinny Complex is either part of the Okhotsk block (e.g., Bindeman et al, ; Konstantinovskaya, ; Parfenov & Natal'in, ), or a separate West Kamchatka microcontinental block (Bogdanov & Chekhovich, ; Chekhovich et al, ; Filatova, ; Zonenshain, ), or represents the metamorphosed equivalent of the terrigenous sediments of the Asian continental margin (e.g., Hourigan et al, ; Kirmasov et al, ; Shapiro & Solov’ev, ). The structurally lowest and highest‐grade unit, the Kolpakova Group, consists of Lower to Upper Cretaceous granulite‐ and amphibolite‐facies gneisses and migmatites (Hourigan et al, ; Tararin, ; Vinogradov et al, ; Figure ).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more geological and geo physical data became available, numerous geological structural maps were published, as well as geological and geological-geophysical sections that characterize the hypothetical deep structure of the region. According to some geodynamic concepts (Chekhovich et al, 2009), northern Kamchatka and its Koryak Upland were viewed as an accretionary collision system during Late Creta ceous and Cenozoic time. This system expressed the accretion of various major lithosphere ensembles (ter MOROZ et al ranes) to the edge of the Asian continent.…”
Section: A Brief Geological and Geophysical Description Of The Areamentioning
confidence: 99%