Genetic Diversity in Microorganisms 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping Techniques for Determining the Diversity of Microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is essential to generate a prior knowledge about the prevalence of pathogens especially E. coli in different source. Understanding their occurrence also the genetic diversity analysis in various potential host sources of contamination would help us to assess the health risk posed by such strains of E. coli and epidemiological surveillance of bacterial infections [ 5 ]. High genetic diversity among E. coli populations potentially influence the accuracy of the results, thus, more information is necessary on the genetic diversity of E. coli populations in a host source of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is essential to generate a prior knowledge about the prevalence of pathogens especially E. coli in different source. Understanding their occurrence also the genetic diversity analysis in various potential host sources of contamination would help us to assess the health risk posed by such strains of E. coli and epidemiological surveillance of bacterial infections [ 5 ]. High genetic diversity among E. coli populations potentially influence the accuracy of the results, thus, more information is necessary on the genetic diversity of E. coli populations in a host source of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important advantage of proposed methods is high discriminatory power, which has been confirmed in the presented research. Both methods exhibit comparable (RFLP-PCR) or higher (MLST) potential for differentiation of the strains tested in comparison to the BOX-PCR method, which is widely used for genotyping of different pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli [15,21,22]. The differentiation of the strains tested with the BOX-PCR method revealed 31 different genotypes, while 29 and 47 clusters were revealed with the fliC RFLP-PCR and MLST methods, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In recent years, significant progress has been observed in the development of new techniques for the genotyping of pathogenic microorganisms [22,25,33]. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still considered as the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between isolates was calculated by numerical analysis of genetic features determined by ERIC-PCR. This molecular genotyping is much faster and more cost-effective; furthermore, it possesses a higher discriminatory ability than other typing techniques (Wolska and Szweda 2012). ERIC-PCR was used successfully, for example, for typing of clinical P. aeruginosa (Wolska and Szweda 2008) and to determine the link between pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates (Yang et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR-based genotyping methods have played an important role in bacterial typing schemes (Wolska and Szweda 2012). One of the PCR-based methods, is Rep-PCR.…”
Section: Inntroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%