2021
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-specific versus pangenotypic regimens in patients infected with HCV genotype 1b in real-world settings

Abstract: The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has provided us with hope to eliminate the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection as a significant public problem in upcoming years. This study compares genotype-specific and pangenotypic regimens in patients with genotype (GT) 1b infection, being the most common GT in Poland. We have confirmed the very high effectiveness and a good safety profile with no significant differences between these two generations of the drug. Male sex and previous treatment with DAA wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the disparity between the two regimens discussed above, we did not show a statistically significant difference in SVR overall between GT-specific and pangenotypic options. This finding is consistent with the results of another Polish RWE analysis evaluating GT-specific vs pangenotypic regimens in GT1b-infected patients and according to our best knowledge there are no other analyses of a comparative nature[ 18 ]. We are aware that our study does not compare the two types of regimens head-to-head, it is a retrospective analysis and the results of comparison in this area should be approached with caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the disparity between the two regimens discussed above, we did not show a statistically significant difference in SVR overall between GT-specific and pangenotypic options. This finding is consistent with the results of another Polish RWE analysis evaluating GT-specific vs pangenotypic regimens in GT1b-infected patients and according to our best knowledge there are no other analyses of a comparative nature[ 18 ]. We are aware that our study does not compare the two types of regimens head-to-head, it is a retrospective analysis and the results of comparison in this area should be approached with caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is difficult to directly compare our results to other studies because to the best of our knowledge, apart from one single-center study from Poland, there is no analysis evaluating different DAA therapies all together in a GT1b-infected population with identifying negative predictors of SVR[ 18 ]. Therefore, we can refer to the prognostic factors of virologic response in the GT1b-infected patients established for a specific DAA regimen, but the findings are inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the overall excellent efficacy of DAA pangenotypic options documented in clinical trials and many real-world experience (RWE) studies, including those carried out in Poland there is still a small percentage of patients who do not respond to therapy [5,6,9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polish studies previously published, including Pabian et al [11] did not include the extremely difficult-to-treat sub-population of patients who failed to respond to pangenotypic regimens simply because such patients appeared recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%