2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic variations in plasma cell free DNA differentiate early stage lung cancers from normal controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a study to compare NGS results from plasma cfDNA and tumor samples using whole genome sequencing and targeted NGS, Xia et al developed a plasma genomic abnormality (PGA) score to reflect mutational status and tumor burden. Patients with lung cancer had a higher plasma cfDNA concentration (4.9 ng per 400 μL, range 2.25-26.98 ng per 400 μL versus 2.32 ng per 400 μL, range 1.30-2.81 ng per 400 μL) and a higher PGA score (19.50, range 5.89-64.47 versus 9.28, range 7.38-11.08) than control patients, and targeted NGS revealed 14 point mutations in 12 genes in solid tumor tissue [65]. Also, to determine the mutations found in plasma and serum cfDNA samples of NSCLC patients, Paweletz et al developed a targeted NGS panel for 11 oncogenes commonly associated with NSCLC.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a study to compare NGS results from plasma cfDNA and tumor samples using whole genome sequencing and targeted NGS, Xia et al developed a plasma genomic abnormality (PGA) score to reflect mutational status and tumor burden. Patients with lung cancer had a higher plasma cfDNA concentration (4.9 ng per 400 μL, range 2.25-26.98 ng per 400 μL versus 2.32 ng per 400 μL, range 1.30-2.81 ng per 400 μL) and a higher PGA score (19.50, range 5.89-64.47 versus 9.28, range 7.38-11.08) than control patients, and targeted NGS revealed 14 point mutations in 12 genes in solid tumor tissue [65]. Also, to determine the mutations found in plasma and serum cfDNA samples of NSCLC patients, Paweletz et al developed a targeted NGS panel for 11 oncogenes commonly associated with NSCLC.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was previously reported as an accidental finding in a lung cancer patient who received neoadjuvant treatment during ccfDNA sampling [26]. Here, the finding was hypothetically explained by rapid tumor shrinkage leading to de-attachment of tumor from adjacent blood supply, and thus to limited release of ccfDNA into the blood stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recently, advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled whole-genome/exome sequencing (WGS, WES) of ccfDNA and depicted complex tumor profiles from ccfDNA [4], [14]. NGS has also been applied for detection of particular somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) [11], [21] or genome-wide SCNA profiles [19], [26] in tumor samples, as well as, in plasma [10]. Even though advances in bioinformatics in principle allow for transformation of sequencing reads into quantitative assessment of copy numbers, the derived SCNAs are sensitive to the quality of the ccfDNA and the choice of processing algorithms and thresholds [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell‐free DNA extraction was published previously (Xia et al ., ,b). In brief, prior to DNA extraction, samples were removed from the freezer and thawed on ice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%