2022
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11121461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Variability of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Circulating in the Russian Federation during Early December 2021 and Late January 2022

Abstract: Analysis of genomic variability of pathogens associated with heightened public health concerns is an opportunity to track transmission routes of the disease and helps to develop more effective vaccines and specific diagnostic tests. We present the findings of a detailed genomic analysis of the genomic variability of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant that spread in Russia between 8 December 2021 and 30 January 2022. We performed phylogenetic analysis of Omicron viral isolates collected in Moscow (n = 589) and down… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A peripheral blood sample was collected from a donor on day 14 following a laboratory-confirmed breakthrough infection with SARS-CoV-2 ( Figure 1A ). The infection occurred at the time of the BA.1/BA.2 Omicron surge in February 2022 ( 35 ). However, the exact variant of the virus was not determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peripheral blood sample was collected from a donor on day 14 following a laboratory-confirmed breakthrough infection with SARS-CoV-2 ( Figure 1A ). The infection occurred at the time of the BA.1/BA.2 Omicron surge in February 2022 ( 35 ). However, the exact variant of the virus was not determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the time of COVID-19 serum collection (January–March 2022) [ 32 ], the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was prevalent in Russia. Therefore, we tested all 81 samples for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant neutralizing antibodies ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%