2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.11535/v3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic content of chemosensory genes correlates with host range in wood-boring beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae, Agrilus planipennis, and Anoplophora glabripennis)

Abstract: Background Olfaction and gustation underlie behaviors that are crucial for insect fitness, such as host and mate selection. The detection of semiochemicals is mediated via proteins from large and rapidly evolving chemosensory gene families; however, the links between a species’ ecology and the diversification of these genes remain poorly understood. Hence, we annotated the chemosensory genes from genomes of wood-boring coleopterans, and compared the gene repertoires from stenophagous species with those from po… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
19
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, I. typographus lacked ORs in groups 3, 4, 5B, and 6, which is also true for D. ponderosae. In contrast to previous studies 39,40 , our tree did not recapitulate the monophyly of OR group 2, with the two group 4 OR members from the cerambycid Anoplophora glabripennis being associated with the 2B group. This discrepancy is likely explained by the limited number of group 4 ORs in the analysis, in combination with the comparatively low node support for the 2A/2B distinction observed previously 39 .…”
Section: Or Annotation and Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, I. typographus lacked ORs in groups 3, 4, 5B, and 6, which is also true for D. ponderosae. In contrast to previous studies 39,40 , our tree did not recapitulate the monophyly of OR group 2, with the two group 4 OR members from the cerambycid Anoplophora glabripennis being associated with the 2B group. This discrepancy is likely explained by the limited number of group 4 ORs in the analysis, in combination with the comparatively low node support for the 2A/2B distinction observed previously 39 .…”
Section: Or Annotation and Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts did not always encode full-length OR sequences. Hence, suffixes were added to gene names following established practice 40 , with NTE and CTE suffixes given to genes with the Nterminus or C-terminus missing, respectively. A FIX suffix was given to genes that were annotated on transcripts which were manually corrected using raw RNAseq reads or following the other current or previously published assemblies 38 .…”
Section: Transcriptome Sequencing Annotation and Phylogenetic Analymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet there is a single outlier to this trend; Agrilus planipennis (132 genes and two pseudogenes), a species that is intermediate in host range, has fewer chemosensory genes than A. viridicyanea. These ndings are generally consistent with the hypothesis that chemosensory gene content and host speci city should correlate in phytophagous beetles [52], although there is clearly an exception to this rule.…”
Section: Chemosensory Gene Familiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, we also found a large expansion in A. viridicyanea in Group 4 that contained 17 ORs. By comparison, no more than four Group 4 OR genes have been previously identi ed in any other surveyed beetle species [52,55].…”
Section: Chemosensory Gene Familiesmentioning
confidence: 98%