2020
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide profiling of circulating tumor DNA depicts landscape of copy number alterations in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis

Abstract: We used whole‐genome sequencing of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) to obtain copy number alteration (CNA) profiles from the plasma of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). These profiles were compared with TCGA‐derived CNA profiles of primary pancreatic tumors. CNA analysis enabled the prediction of tumor burden and tumor prognosis, and assessment of therapeutic response and clonal evolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 42 studies measured the cfDNA in plasma [ 9 , 13 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], three studies measured it from serum [ 37 , 47 , 67 ], two studies measured it from blood [ 20 , 22 ] and one study examined the cfDNA both in serum and plasma [ 23 ]. The time of the sampling was pre-treatment in 29 studies [ 9 , 13 , 23 , 24 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In total, 42 studies measured the cfDNA in plasma [ 9 , 13 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], three studies measured it from serum [ 37 , 47 , 67 ], two studies measured it from blood [ 20 , 22 ] and one study examined the cfDNA both in serum and plasma [ 23 ]. The time of the sampling was pre-treatment in 29 studies [ 9 , 13 , 23 , 24 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of the sampling was pre-treatment in 29 studies [ 9 , 13 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 29 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ], pre/post-treatment in 10 studies [ 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 35 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 47 , 59 ], post-treatment only in two studies [ 48 , 50 ], pre/post and during treatment in one study [ 22 ], and six studies did not report the time of sampling [ 20 , 21 , 31 , 51 , 56 , 61 ]. KRAS was explicitly measured in 41 studies [ 9 , 20 , 21 , 22 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative differences in read count between bins can be sensitively detected even when the total read count is low [20, 21, 22], meaning that SCNAs can be detected with a fraction of the sequencing depth required for SNV detection. Therefore SCNA profiling offers a high-throughput and cost-effective means to evaluate cfDNA samples [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%