2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide identification of vegetative phase transition-associated microRNAs and target predictions using degradome sequencing in Malus hupehensis

Abstract: BackgroundA long juvenile period between germination and flowering is a common characteristic among fruit trees, including Malus hupehensis (Pamp.) Rehd., which is an apple rootstock widely used in China. microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in the regulation of phase transition and reproductive growth processes.ResultsM. hupehensis RNA libraries, one adult and one juvenile phase, were constructed using tree leaves and underwent high-throughput sequencing. We identified 42 known miRNA families and 172 nov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(78 reference statements)
6
72
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the six miRNA libraries, the reads’ size distributions were quite similar (Figure S4), but the read size distribution in the degradome library was significantly different from those of the miRNA libraries (Figure S2). The length of sRNA varied, with 21‐, 22‐, 23‐ and 24‐nt small RNAs forming the major population, and 24 nt was the most dominant length in the six libraries (Figure S1), which was similar to the results obtained from other plants, such as Malus hupehensis and Arabidopsis thaliana (Confraria et al ., ; Xing et al ., ). The total raw reads were categorized into 12 different classes, exon _antisense (0.91%), exon_sense (1.42%), intron _antisense (2.31%), intron_sense (2.72%), miRNA (2.50%), rRNA (19.16%), repeat (3.04%), scRNA (0), snRNA (0.02%), snoRNA (0.02%), tRNA (2.06%) and others (65.83%), for the CES library (Table S3), by matching them to the domesticated apple's genome in the Rfam (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/rfam.html) and GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) databases using the tag2annotation software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the six miRNA libraries, the reads’ size distributions were quite similar (Figure S4), but the read size distribution in the degradome library was significantly different from those of the miRNA libraries (Figure S2). The length of sRNA varied, with 21‐, 22‐, 23‐ and 24‐nt small RNAs forming the major population, and 24 nt was the most dominant length in the six libraries (Figure S1), which was similar to the results obtained from other plants, such as Malus hupehensis and Arabidopsis thaliana (Confraria et al ., ; Xing et al ., ). The total raw reads were categorized into 12 different classes, exon _antisense (0.91%), exon_sense (1.42%), intron _antisense (2.31%), intron_sense (2.72%), miRNA (2.50%), rRNA (19.16%), repeat (3.04%), scRNA (0), snRNA (0.02%), snoRNA (0.02%), tRNA (2.06%) and others (65.83%), for the CES library (Table S3), by matching them to the domesticated apple's genome in the Rfam (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/rfam.html) and GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) databases using the tag2annotation software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar results can be seen in Xing et al . (). In addition, the expression levels of these identified known miRNAs in the six libraries between shoot‐bending and control treatments were divided into eight different categories based on their read content's frequencies, with almost no differences among the libraries (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, if there are mRNAs cleaved by a miRNA after its 10 th nucleotide, one would observe alignment of RNA termini matching the predicted miRNA binding site. Degradome analysis usually defines a category of transcripts predicted to be endonucleolytically cleaved and then are cleavage positions compared to predicted miRNA binding sites (Li and Sunkar, 2013;Xing et al, 2014;Ding et al, 2016;Fan et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016). Degradome analysis and target prediction has been integrated in to a web resource comPARE for plant miRNA target analysis (Kakrana et al, 2014).…”
Section: Degradome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have done a lot of research on the regulation of GA on flower bud 4 0 9 differentiation in fruit trees (Xing et al, 2014;Yamaguchi et al, 2014). Apart from significant difference after spraying with 1-MCP (Table 1).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%