2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-016-1698-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study of the husk number and weight in maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heritability of husk related traits in maize such as husk dry weight, husk width, husk thickness, etc. have been reported, and the heritability range is between 0.36 and 0.89 (Dan et al, 2001;Cui et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016). In this study, HTI showed a wide range of phenotypic variation and followed a normal distribution ( Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 1).…”
Section: Genetic Basis Of Htisupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heritability of husk related traits in maize such as husk dry weight, husk width, husk thickness, etc. have been reported, and the heritability range is between 0.36 and 0.89 (Dan et al, 2001;Cui et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016). In this study, HTI showed a wide range of phenotypic variation and followed a normal distribution ( Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 1).…”
Section: Genetic Basis Of Htisupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Husk traits show broad variations that are subject to genetic regulation and have dissimilar characteristics depending on the genetic background (Zhou et al, 2016). The HN, husk fresh weight, husk dry weight, HL, HW, HT and the total area of the husk are mainly controlled by additive genetic effects (Ping et al, 2000;Dan et al, 2001;Gui-Hua et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of both K and PK matrices into a MLM has been successfully used in other species that exhibited significant population structure and relatedness (Gajardo et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2016). Furthermore, the K model computational time is faster, and no additional steps like identifying population structure and PCs in the germplasm are required (Pasam et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three traits are Husk Length (HL), Husk layer Number (HN), and Husk Width (HW), The study found 21 quantitative trait loci (QTL). Husk morphology varies widely among different maize inbred lines 10,[20][21][22] . In 2016, the first GWAS was conducted with 253 inbred lines and 3 K markers 22 and identified 24 markers associated with HN using the threshold of P < 0.001 without multiple test correction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%