2016
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study of caffeine metabolites provides new insights to caffeine metabolism and dietary caffeine-consumption behavior

Abstract: Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive substance in the world and presents with wide interindividual variation in metabolism. This variation may modify potential adverse or beneficial effects of caffeine on health. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of plasma caffeine, paraxanthine, theophylline, theobromine and paraxanthine/caffeine ratio among up to 9,876 individuals of European ancestry from six population-based studies. A single SNP at 6p23 (near CD83) and several SNPs at 7p21 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
141
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
15
141
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted the analysis in 114 316 individuals from the UK Biobank study, including a subset of 48 692 individuals with 2‐hour dietary recall data, with the aims of determining the associations of coffee‐related genetic risk scores with: (1) non‐alcoholic beverage consumption (including subtypes of coffee and tea) and (2) socio‐demographic and life‐style factors. These analyses extend previously published work conducted in UK Biobank, which presented directions of effect and P ‐values of these SNPs with coffee and tea intake, but did not investigate associations with subtypes of coffee and tea or other beverages .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conducted the analysis in 114 316 individuals from the UK Biobank study, including a subset of 48 692 individuals with 2‐hour dietary recall data, with the aims of determining the associations of coffee‐related genetic risk scores with: (1) non‐alcoholic beverage consumption (including subtypes of coffee and tea) and (2) socio‐demographic and life‐style factors. These analyses extend previously published work conducted in UK Biobank, which presented directions of effect and P ‐values of these SNPs with coffee and tea intake, but did not investigate associations with subtypes of coffee and tea or other beverages .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…CYP1A2 is the enzyme responsible primarily for metabolizing caffeine and AHR affects CYP1A2 activity . It is likely that these variants affect coffee consumption through altering rate of caffeine metabolism; there is evidence that the coffee consumption‐increasing alleles of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) decrease blood caffeine levels . Of note, five of the six additional loci (or close proxies, in or near the following genes: GCKR , ABCG2 , MLXIPL , BDNF , EFCAB5 ) have also been identified in GWAS of other phenotypes, such as body mass index and smoking initiation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown in a GWAS of blood metabolites and of caffeine metabolites 27, 28. Caffeine is metabolized primarily by the enzyme CYP1A2 29, but does not inhibit nicotine pharmacokinetics in‐vivo nor does it alter cigarette consumption 25, 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, frequent consumption of caffeine does in itself not disrupt sleep, while caffeine withdrawal actually increases sleepiness -this is what has been observed for daytime sleepiness (5). While the genetic instrument that we used for caffeine has been robustly associated with higher caffeine consumption (13), these same genetic variants are also associated with lower circulating caffeine levels (32). The most likely explanation for this is that even though these individuals consume more caffeine, they metabolise caffeine more rapidly and therefore show lower blood concentrations of caffeine and its metabolites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%