2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421784112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide ancestry of 17th-century enslaved Africans from the Caribbean

Abstract: Between 1500 and 1850, more than 12 million enslaved Africans were transported to the New World. The vast majority were shipped from West and West-Central Africa, but their precise origins are largely unknown. We used genome-wide ancient DNA analyses to investigate the genetic origins of three enslaved Africans whose remains were recovered on the Caribbean island of Saint Martin. We trace their origins to distinct subcontinental source populations within Africa, including Bantu-speaking groups from northern Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

20
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
20
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding assortment and migrations, we find that the estimated number of generations since the admixture event is 15. Assuming a generation time of 25 years, this places the initial migrations in the mid-17th century, which is consistent with the history of African Americans (Schroeder et al 2015). …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Adding assortment and migrations, we find that the estimated number of generations since the admixture event is 15. Assuming a generation time of 25 years, this places the initial migrations in the mid-17th century, which is consistent with the history of African Americans (Schroeder et al 2015). …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is consistent with slave records and previous genome-wide analyses of African Americans indicating that most sharing occurred in West and West-Central Africa. [80][81][82] There are subtle differences between the African origins of the ACB and ASW populations (e.g., difference in distance from YRI on AS-PC1 and AS-PC2 p ¼ 6.4 3 10 À6 ), likely due either to mild island founder effects in the ACB samples or differences in African source populations for enslaved Africans who remained in Barbados versus those who were brought to the USA. The Native tracts of ancestry from the AMR populations first separate the southernmost PEL populations from the CLM, MXL, and PUR on AS-PC1, then separate the northernmost MXL from the CLM and PUR on AS-PC2, consistent with a north-south cline of divergence among indigenous Native American ancestry ( Figure 1G).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Within and Between Populations In The Amermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) and have been used to assign historic individuals to their most likely geographic origin (18)(19)(20). In particular, the genome-wide analysis of 1,000s or more single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) allows the determination of an individual's geographic origin with accuracy and precision, even when limited genetic differentiation exists among regions (20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) and have been used to assign historic individuals to their most likely geographic origin (18)(19)(20). In particular, the genome-wide analysis of 1,000s or more single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) allows the determination of an individual's geographic origin with accuracy and precision, even when limited genetic differentiation exists among regions (20)(21)(22). Since low levels of genetic differentiation are typical for marine species with high dispersal capabilities like Atlantic cod (23,24), such genome-wide approaches are essential to increase the assignment power of modern (22) and ancient samples of these species (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%