2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2202764119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people

Abstract: The use of spoken and written language is a fundamental human capacity. Individual differences in reading- and language-related skills are influenced by genetic variation, with twin-based heritability estimates of 30 to 80% depending on the trait. The genetic architecture is complex, heterogeneous, and multifactorial, but investigations of contributions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were thus far underpowered. We present a multicohort genome-wide association study (GWAS) of five traits assessed ind… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
105
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
105
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 38 associated loci (the 4 remaining were tagged by indels unavailable in validation cohorts), 3 (rs13082684, rs34349354 and rs11393101) were significant at a Bonferroni-corrected level ( P < 0.05/38) in the GenLang consortium GWAS meta-analysis of reading ( n = 33,959) and spelling ( n = 18,514) ability 14 . At P < 0.05, 18 were associated in GenLang, 3 in the NeuroDys case-control GWAS 12 ( n = 2,274 cases), and 5 in the Chinese Reading Study (CRS) of reading accuracy and fluency ( n = 2,270; Supplementary Note ) (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 3 – 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of 38 associated loci (the 4 remaining were tagged by indels unavailable in validation cohorts), 3 (rs13082684, rs34349354 and rs11393101) were significant at a Bonferroni-corrected level ( P < 0.05/38) in the GenLang consortium GWAS meta-analysis of reading ( n = 33,959) and spelling ( n = 18,514) ability 14 . At P < 0.05, 18 were associated in GenLang, 3 in the NeuroDys case-control GWAS 12 ( n = 2,274 cases), and 5 in the Chinese Reading Study (CRS) of reading accuracy and fluency ( n = 2,270; Supplementary Note ) (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 3 – 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest GWAS of dyslexia to date (>50,000 self-reported diagnoses), we identified 42 significant independent loci. Of these, 14 , and 1 in a Chinese language cohort. Of the significant SNPs, 36% overlapped with variants from general cognitive ability GWAS, consistent with twin studies that find that genetic variation in reading disability is explained by general and reading-specific cognitive ability 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10. 23.513381 doi: bioRxiv preprint ability/disability and reading/dyslexia-related cognitive predictors in recent years [18][19][20]. Reading accuracy and reading fluency are two important aspects to account reading ability/disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than GWAS with dyslexia, more and more candidate gene studies and GWAS started to investigate genetic correlates with quantitative trait of reading ability/disability and reading/dyslexia-related cognitive predictors in recent years [18][19][20]. Reading accuracy and reading fluency are two important aspects to account reading ability/disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%