1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)6:3<79::aid-evan2>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics and domestic cattle origins

Abstract: Genetics has the potential to provide a novel layer of information pertaining to the origins and relationships of domestic cattle. While it is important not to overstate the power of archeological inference from genetic data, some previously widespread conjectures are inevitably contradicted with the addition of new information. Conjectures regarding domesticated cattle that fall into this category include a single domestication event with the development of Bos indicus breeds from earlier Bos taurus domestica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
90
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominant subclade T1'2'3 is formed by three major branches corresponding to the previously defined haplogroups T1, T2 and T3, whereas T4 turned out to be nested within T3. Coalescence ages and geographical distributions of the T branches support a Neolithic origin for all T mtDNAs from a Fertile Crescent aurochs population, and dismiss the possibility of other domestication foci involving T mtDNAs in different geographic areas [1], [4], [10], [11]. Indeed, multiple domestication events would have required that African, European and East Asian B. primigenius populations not only harboured mtDNAs belonging to T but that their T mtDNAs had remained almost identical relative to the Near Eastern counterparts during their allopatric evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The predominant subclade T1'2'3 is formed by three major branches corresponding to the previously defined haplogroups T1, T2 and T3, whereas T4 turned out to be nested within T3. Coalescence ages and geographical distributions of the T branches support a Neolithic origin for all T mtDNAs from a Fertile Crescent aurochs population, and dismiss the possibility of other domestication foci involving T mtDNAs in different geographic areas [1], [4], [10], [11]. Indeed, multiple domestication events would have required that African, European and East Asian B. primigenius populations not only harboured mtDNAs belonging to T but that their T mtDNAs had remained almost identical relative to the Near Eastern counterparts during their allopatric evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…172-173;Horwitz et al 1999). Demographic evidence suggests that at least one of the four domestic lineages of taurine cattle (Bradley 2006) originated in the Euphrates Valley between about 11,000 and 10,000 cal. B.P.…”
Section: Domestication Of Animalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The original has a maximum length/height of 7.5 and 3.9 cm respectively the situation further north. Acrocentric Y chromosomes, indicative of crossing with zebu males, are, for example, known from recent Eastern African breeds, such as the Kenana, Boran and some Malawi zebus (Bradley, Loftus, Cunningham, & MacHugh, 1998;Bradley et al, 1994;Frisch et al, 1997). These and other analyses indicate that the introgression of zebu genes into East African cattle, presumably from the 7th century AD onwards, mainly or exclusively occurred through paternal lineage (cf.…”
Section: The Autochthonous Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%