2004
DOI: 10.2527/2004.823647x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: Mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives1

Abstract: Nephawe, K. A.; Cundiff, L. V.; Dikeman, M. E.; Crouse, J. D.; and Van Vleck, L. Dale, "Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: Mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives" (2004 ABSTRACT: Data from the first four cycles of the Germplasm Evaluation Program at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) were used to investigate genetic relationships between mature weight (MW, n = 37,710)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the present work, Schenkel et al (2004) and Nephawe et al (2004) also estimated negative correlations between HH and BF, but although significantly different from zero, their estimates were of smaller magnitude (−0.17 and −0.16, respectively). When analyzing the genetic correlations between subcutaneous fat and height measured at different body locations, such as hump height or wither Ultrasound and carcass genetic parameters for Nelore height, Aass (1996) and Smith et al (2007) also found moderately negative genetic correlations of −0.29 and −0.20 between these traits, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in the present work, Schenkel et al (2004) and Nephawe et al (2004) also estimated negative correlations between HH and BF, but although significantly different from zero, their estimates were of smaller magnitude (−0.17 and −0.16, respectively). When analyzing the genetic correlations between subcutaneous fat and height measured at different body locations, such as hump height or wither Ultrasound and carcass genetic parameters for Nelore height, Aass (1996) and Smith et al (2007) also found moderately negative genetic correlations of −0.29 and −0.20 between these traits, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Because BW at any age are genetically and positively correlated, selection for BW at young ages will result in larger birth and adult BW (Meyer, 1993;Kaps et al, 1999). Also, selection for faster growth will lead to large-frame ani-mals that mature at heavier BW (Meyer, 1993;Nephawe et al, 2004;Yokoo et al, 2007). This strategy is especially inappropriate for extensive production systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Van Vleck et al, 1992;Barkhouse et al, 1996;Splan et al, 1998;Johnston et al, 2003), suggesting that selection for decreased toughness would result in little genetic progress. Only the studies of Wilson et al (1976) and Nephawe et al (2004) report higher heritabilities for toughness, being 0.23 and 0.26, respectively. However, Johnston et al (2003) reported heritabilities for toughness-related traits in tropical cattle breeds that were two to three times higher than those generally found in temperate breeds, begging the question of why the tropical and temperate cattle differ in this trait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lamb flavour, in our study, was moderately heritable (0.21), which differs from available estimates in studies in beef cattle. Specifically, published heritabilities of beef flavour are 0.03 (Van Vleck et al, 1992), 0.04 (Splan et al, 1998) and 0.05 (Nephawe et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also similar to the results obtained by Urioste et al (1998) in pasture-fed Uruguayan beef cattle as well as those of Nephawe (2004) in Bonsmara cattle using random regression models. The estimates are, however, lower than those Mwansa et al (2002) in Hereford cows and Nephawe et al (2004) in Hereford Angus cows. It is also lower than the average of the estimates listed by Koots et al (1994) in a review article.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Relationship Between Cow Age Class (In Years) Amentioning
confidence: 41%