2004
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2004016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters for litter size in sheep: natural versus hormone-induced oestrus

Abstract: -The litter size in Suffolk and Texel-sheep was analysed using REML and Bayesian methods. Litters born after hormonal induced oestrus and after natural oestrus were treated as different traits in order to estimate the genetic correlation between the traits. Explanatory variables were the age of the ewe at lambing, period of lambing, a year*flock-effect, a permanent environmental effect associated with the ewe, and the additive genetic effect. The heritability estimates for litter size ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(42 reference statements)
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic parameters were very similar in both breeds. Heritability (h 2 : 0.09) and repeatability (r; 0.10 to 0.14) were low and in full agreement with the classical values of these parameters for this species (Janssens et al ., 2004). A single copy of the FecL L in Noire du Velay increased the mean prolificacy by 0.42 lamb per lambing ( P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Genetic parameters were very similar in both breeds. Heritability (h 2 : 0.09) and repeatability (r; 0.10 to 0.14) were low and in full agreement with the classical values of these parameters for this species (Janssens et al ., 2004). A single copy of the FecL L in Noire du Velay increased the mean prolificacy by 0.42 lamb per lambing ( P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Additive genetic correlation estimates between two continuous traits have been largely unbiased in linear GS analyses of simulated data (Van Tassell & Van Vleck 1996). In both simulated and real data analyses, positive additive genetic correlation estimates have taken larger values under REML than under GS (Van Tassell & Van Vleck 1996;Janssens et al 2004). Our results indicate that regardless of the amount of information used additive genetic correlation estimates have to be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…; Janssens et al . ; Arnason & Jónmundsson ; Cottle et al . ), are expressed later in life, are more time consuming to record and are sex limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%