1987
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.7.7.2397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic manipulation of centromere function.

Abstract: A conditional centromere was constructed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by placing the centromere of chromosome III immediately downstream from the inducible GAL) promoter from S. cerevisiae. By utilizing growth conditions that favor either transcriptional induction (galactose-carbon source) or repression (glucosecarbon source) from the GAL) promoter, centromere function can be switched off or on, respectively. With the conditional centromere we were able to radically alter the mitotic transmission pattern of bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
195
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
195
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unlikely that VP16 disrupts the kinetochore by directly bombarding it with large numbers of transcribing polymerases, as is the case for conditional centromeres in budding yeast (Hill and Bloom, 1987). The level of RNA polymerase II induced by tetR-EYFP-VP16 remained at only about half of that of a typical euchromatic gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that VP16 disrupts the kinetochore by directly bombarding it with large numbers of transcribing polymerases, as is the case for conditional centromeres in budding yeast (Hill and Bloom, 1987). The level of RNA polymerase II induced by tetR-EYFP-VP16 remained at only about half of that of a typical euchromatic gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because such minichromosomes cannot be propagated, we needed to establish an induction system by which we can make them from minichromosomes that are propagated stably (figure 2; Dewar et al 2004). The original minichromosome carried two centromeres; the first one was constitutively active and the second one was conditionally inactivated owing to its juxtaposition to the GAL1-10 promoter (Hill & Bloom 1987). The chromosome also possessed a single replication origin flanked by recombination Monotelic attachment: one of the sister kinetochores attaches to microtubules, whereas the other does not attach to any microtubules.…”
Section: Tension-dependent Mechanism To Ensure Bi-orientation In Mitosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the centromeres (DNA underlying the kinetochore protein complex) have been pinpointed to sequences no longer than 120 bp (Hegemann & Fleig 1993), which allows us to regulate the activity of centromeres. For instance, we can conditionally turn off the centromere activity by transcription from an adjacent GAL1-10 promoter (Hill & Bloom 1987). The behaviour of yeast centromeres can be followed by marking them with arrays of bacterial operators bound by repressor proteins fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP; Goshima & Yanagida 2000;He et al 2000;Tanaka et al 2000;Pearson et al 2001).…”
Section: Sister Kinetochore Bi-orientation (Chromosome Bi-orientation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, targeting of factors promoting the formation of heterochromatin associated with HP1␣ strongly disrupted the conditional kinetochore, as judged by loss of centromeric proteins, alteration of the pattern of chromatin modifications within the centromere, and destabilisation of the HAC (Nakano et al, 2008). The alphoid tetO HAC system has important differences from the only other conditional centromere system, which was developed for the point centromere of budding yeast (Hill and Bloom, 1987). That centromere is inactivated by being bombarded by transcription from an adjacent strong promoter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alphoid tetO HAC system has important differences from the only other conditional centromere system, which was developed for the point centromere of budding yeast (Hill and Bloom, 1987). That centromere is inactivated by being bombarded by transcription from an adjacent strong promoter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%