2010
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2010171033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evidence for the presence of two species ofOnchocercafrom the wild boar in Japan

Abstract: Summary :In order to clarify the genetic differences between Onchocerca dewittei japonica, the causative agent of zoonotic onchocerciasis in Japan and a related undescribed Onchocerca sp., both parasitizing wild boar (Sus scrofa) of which the infective larval stages are indistinguishable from each other, we compared the sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) gene region from four infective larvae (recovered from experimentally infected black flies), one microfilaria, and one adult … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sensu Fukuda et al, 2008, another parasite of wild boar Onchocerca sp. sensu Fukuda et al, 2008, another species from wild boar, was first distinguished at the microfilarial stage by its body length, which was much greater than that of O. dewittei japonica, and its distinctness as a species was confirmed by DNA analysis (Fukuda et al, 2010b). The infective larvae of Onchocerca sp.…”
Section: Natural and Putative Vector Blackfly Speciesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…sensu Fukuda et al, 2008, another parasite of wild boar Onchocerca sp. sensu Fukuda et al, 2008, another species from wild boar, was first distinguished at the microfilarial stage by its body length, which was much greater than that of O. dewittei japonica, and its distinctness as a species was confirmed by DNA analysis (Fukuda et al, 2010b). The infective larvae of Onchocerca sp.…”
Section: Natural and Putative Vector Blackfly Speciesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The mitochondrial CO1 gene was amplified using the primer set CO1intF-CO1intR (Casiraghi et al, 2001) as described elsewhere (Fukuda et al, 2010). Briefly, PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 µl containing 1 × Ex Taq buffer including 2 mM Mg 2+ , 200 µM each of dNTPs, 0.1 µM each of primers, 1.25 units of Ex Taq Polymerase (TAKARA BIO INC., Otsu, Japan), and 3 µl of template DNA under the following thermal conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by five cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min and 37 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 48°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min.…”
Section: Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(nucleotide difference: 0-0.2 %), where differences between type B and other Onchocerca species were 7.5-11.8 %. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of three larvae of type A (L-7-L-9) had difference of more than 9.1 % and 0.9 % from any Oncho- (Fukuda et al, 2010). b The CO1 sequence was identical to that of AB518694 (Fukuda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of Infective Larvae From Wild-caughmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations