2016
DOI: 10.21608/jacb.2016.40781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GENETIC DIVERSITY OF RICE BLAST FUNGUS POPULATIONS (Pyricularia grisea) USING MOLECULAR MARKERS

Abstract: Pyricularia grisea fungus which causing rice blast disease is one of the main pathological races threats to rice crop in Egypt and worldwide. Thirty isolates out of known 144 strains of this fungus were selected according to geographical locations. Isolates of P. grisea, were analyzed by SSR markers to determine the amount of genetic variability among these races. Sixteen primers out of 26 were amplified and produced a total of 83 alleles . Number of alleles per marker ranged from 3 for C7-1.4, P9-0.4 and P9-1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 9 , the H e values for all SSR markers used in this study varied from 0.94 to 1.00, with an average of 0.98. The findings were in agreement with the observation of [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. The highest H e value (1.00) was recorded for RM23 and 518.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 9 , the H e values for all SSR markers used in this study varied from 0.94 to 1.00, with an average of 0.98. The findings were in agreement with the observation of [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. The highest H e value (1.00) was recorded for RM23 and 518.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This marker could be useful in MAS for these characters in rice. The results were similar to those obtained by [ 46 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DNA markers could be used to differentiate genes involved in rice drought tolerance (Kumar et al 2016;Barik et al 2019;Prakash et al 2019;Upadhyaya and Panda 2019;Panda et al 2021). The PIC value provided information regarding determining marker values to detect polymorphisms (El-Wahsh et al 2016). There was one marker that was classified as low (RM 248) and two markers classified as moderate (RM 72 and RM 228), while the other 17 markers were classified as highly informative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIC value defines the value of marker for detecting polymorphism within a population under investigation, depending number of detectable alleles and their frequency distribution, providing an estimate of discriminating power of the marker [43]. As it shown in Table 2, the PIC values for the SSR used in this study varied from 0.83 to 0.99 with an average of 0.94.…”
Section: Polymorphic Information Content Value (Pic)mentioning
confidence: 98%