2013
DOI: 10.2298/gensr1303737a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of partial resistance to basal stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) in sunflower

Abstract: Basal stem rot, caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, is one of the major diseases of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the world. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) implicated in partial resistance to basal stem rot disease were identified using 99 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross between sunflower parental lines PAC2 and RHA266. The study was undertaken in a completely randomized design with three replications under controlled conditions. The RILs and their parental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of an artificial inoculation method by Gulya et al (2008) provided the opportunity to evaluate a large number of sunflower lines for BSR in multiple field environments (Talukder et al, 2014b,c). Prior to our study, there were only two reports of QTL mapping for BSR resistance in a sunflower RIL mapping population, PAC2 × RHA266 (Davar et al, 2010; Amouzadeh et al, 2013). Both studies were conducted under controlled growth chamber conditions but with different fungal isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of an artificial inoculation method by Gulya et al (2008) provided the opportunity to evaluate a large number of sunflower lines for BSR in multiple field environments (Talukder et al, 2014b,c). Prior to our study, there were only two reports of QTL mapping for BSR resistance in a sunflower RIL mapping population, PAC2 × RHA266 (Davar et al, 2010; Amouzadeh et al, 2013). Both studies were conducted under controlled growth chamber conditions but with different fungal isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Amouzadeh et al (2013) screened the same RIL population with fungal isolate SSKH41 and identified five QTL on LGs 1, 3, 8, 10, and 17. Among them, LGs 10 and 17 were common with our study, where we also identified BSR resistance QTL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, seven of the eight resistant introgression lines developed in this study had the alien segments detected in LG8, suggesting that new QTL of BSR resistance from the wild species are also present in this linkage group. The two QTL on LG10 detected by Amouzadeh et al (2013) and Talukder et al (2016) are located at a region between 253.4 and 281. 3 Mb, while ~34 polymorphic SNPs (66.7% of the shared SNPs) in LG10 that detected alien segments in three introgression lines were also located in this region (Table 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Amouzadeh et al (2013) reported QTL conferring partial resistance to BSR using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross of PCA2/RHA 266. The five QTL for the percentage of necrotic area, based on controlled growth chamber tests, were located on LGs 1, 3, 8, 10, and 17 with the small effects, and each QTL explained between 0.5 and 3.2% of the observed phenotypic variance in the RIL population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breeding using resistant germplasm is the most economic and efficient disease management strategy used by most sunflower breeding programs. However, BSR resistance breeding is relatively complex, as resistance is controlled by multiple genes, each with a small effect (Davar et al, 2010; Talukder et al, 2014b), some of which have been mapped to the sunflower genome and linked with DNA markers (Davar et al, 2010; Amouzadeh et al, 2013; Talukder et al, 2016). Although no sunflower hybrids are completely resistant to BSR, significant variation in tolerance to this disease has been reported in currently available germplasm resources (Talukder et al, 2014a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%