2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm for energy-efficient clustering and routing in wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of OBC-WOA clearly exceeds the performances of the existing method such as FKM-CMA [17], WOA [18], PSO [12], and GSA [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of OBC-WOA clearly exceeds the performances of the existing method such as FKM-CMA [17], WOA [18], PSO [12], and GSA [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The significant energy usage in a specified round can be a reasonable assessment of the power effectiveness of the algorithm. The cumulative quantity of energy left in the battery at the end of the simulation shall be evaluated by calculating the cumulative quantity (in joules) [19,20]. (Eq.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they considered the sensor nodes dead rate by utilizing different routing protocols in their research to verify and compare the results. The genetic algorithm-based energy-efficient clustering and routing approach (GECR) for load balancing of WSNs was suggested by Wang et al [34]. To resolve, the load balancing issue in WSNs an energy-efficient scalable routing algorithm (EESRA) was proposed by Elsmany et al [35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, some shortcomings are also present in LEACH such as selecting nodes with low residual energy as CHs, distributing clusters unevenly, unbalancing energy consumption and increasing overhead of control messages due to its random CH selection and fixed round time. So great efforts have been made to improve the performance of LEACH from different aspects for clustering routing methods and expected results have been achieved since then [6][7][8][9][10]. Clustering routing method usually contains three main phases: clustering, routing, maintaining clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering usually consists of CHs selection and clusters formation. Many approaches have been provided for CHs selection, which can be categorized into probability based [4][5][6][11][12][13][14], weight based [7,[15][16][17] and heuristics based [9,10,[18][19][20] approaches. The nodes are selected as CHs when their threshold values are less than a random assigned real number between 0 and 1 in probability based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%