Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1835804.1835897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative models for ticket resolution in expert networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
45
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists the details of ten data sets after data preparation. [17] Fig 1. Algorithms for instance selection, feature selection, and bug triage.…”
Section: B Experimental Evaluation: Data Sets and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists the details of ten data sets after data preparation. [17] Fig 1. Algorithms for instance selection, feature selection, and bug triage.…”
Section: B Experimental Evaluation: Data Sets and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In data mining, the difficulties of bug triage narrate to the problems of expert finding (e.g., [6], [24]) and ticket routing (e.g., [16], [19]). In contrast to the broad areas in professional outcome or ticket routing, bug triage only focuses on allocating developers for bug reports.…”
Section: ) Bug Triagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shao et al [18] propose a sequence mining algorithm to improve the efficiency of task resolution in IT service. Miao et al [12] develop generative models and recommend better routing by considering both task routing sequences and task contents. In [22], Zhang et al study the resolution of prediction tasks, which are to obtain probability assessments for a question of interest.…”
Section: Figure 1: a Sample Collaborative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%