2022
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2022.2057763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of force and torque during joining of AZ91C plates by FSW under distinctive tool tilt angle and their impact on mechanical strength and micro-structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top view of the spot welds plunged by the tool shoulder was comprised of circular friction stirring onion rings on the upper aluminium weld samples as remarked in friction stir welded AZ91C Mg alloy 51 (Figure 13). There was tool pin assisted cylindrical hole also noticed as the revolving tool withdrawn just after welding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top view of the spot welds plunged by the tool shoulder was comprised of circular friction stirring onion rings on the upper aluminium weld samples as remarked in friction stir welded AZ91C Mg alloy 51 (Figure 13). There was tool pin assisted cylindrical hole also noticed as the revolving tool withdrawn just after welding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the zone of agitation of the joint manufactured at 0 °angle of tilt, the rest of the 2 weldments made using the TPNT tool don't show onion ring characteristics. At the very instant, this onion kind of circle had been seen very commonly within the tool stir region produced by the TPNT tool [41]. Te onion ring shape comes from the way through the softened metal fow.…”
Section: Force and Torque Generationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the literature survey [26][27][28], the most dominant parameters which were proven to play a vital role in impacting the properties of the AZ80A Mg alloy joints to be attained by employing the FSW process are listed out in table 2, along with their respective distinctive levels, notation and units. Due to the broad spectrum of the dominating parameters of the FSW process, it was proposed to choose a central composite category response surface based matrix of design possessing 4 dominant factors (parameters of FSW process), 5 distinct levels having 31 runs.…”
Section: Parameters Of Fsw Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it does not analyze all the possible combinations of variables that impact the outcomes of the process, particularly when the process is complex, non-linear or dynamic [21,22]. As a result, in the recent years, several researchers have preferred response surface based design methodology for their experimental works with respect to the FSW process and have proved that the employment of this RSM ( i.e., response surface methodology) is effective in formulating the empirical relationship amidst several parameters of the FSW process and in anticipating the responses [23][24][25][26]. As a result, in this experimental investigation, an attempt was put forward to attain AZ80A Mg alloy joints possessing highest value of tensile strength through the employment of central composite based design technique of RSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%