A person's performance on a perceptual task can be significantly improved by repetitive training on the task. This improvement is termed perceptual learning and is regarded as a manifestation of adult plasticity in perceptual and brain processing (1). To date, detailed neural mechanisms of perceptual learning have yet to be completely understood. The recent study by Chen et al. in PNAS (2) advances the understanding by showing that transfer of perceptual learning of 100% coherent motion to noisy motion is associated with dramatic changes in involved neural sites.Distinguished from other types of learning and memory, many types of perceptual learning occur only for the trained feature and its presented location (3, 4). Such specificity has been interpreted as a manifestation of involvements of local circuits in early sensory cortical areas, which generally have smaller receptive fields than higher level cortical areas in perceptual and brain information processing (5).However, it has also been suggested that, as perceptual learning proceeds, those neural sites involved sometimes shift from higher-level cortical areas to lower-level ones (6). More recently, it has been found that, if some methods are combined with traditional training methods of perceptual learning, perceptual learning of a stimulus at a location in the visual field is transferred to other locations (7,8). These findings have attracted a great deal of attention because they suggest that neural sites involved in perceptual learning include brain regions beyond early sensory areas. These results are also consistent with the model that reweighting between sensory processing and perceptual decision underlies perceptual learning (9-11).Chen et al. have developed an ingenious experimental design to examine how two different areas, V3A and MT+, are involved in perceptual learning of a coherent motion task and its transfer to a different type of motion. Before training, participants' performance was measured for two types motion stimuli, 100% coherent motion and 40% coherent motion, presented on different sides of the visual field. A 100% coherent motion display consisted of dots, all of which move at the same direction and speed. A display with 40% coherent motion consists of only 40% of dots moving coherently while the remaining 60% of dots move randomly and therefore is regarded as a noisy motion display.Next, to examine brain areas that play significant roles in processing 100% and 40% coherent motions, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied on a region of the scalp close to V3A in one group of participants and to MT+ in the other group. The V3A-disturbed group showed impaired performance on discrimination of 100% coherent motion directions, whereas the MT+-disturbed group showed impaired performance on discrimination of 40% coherent motion directions. These results suggest that V3A plays an important role in processing 100% coherent motion, whereas it is MT+ that plays a significant role in processing a noisy 40% coherent motion.Then, bo...