2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.023010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General constraints on dark matter decay from the cosmic microwave background

Abstract: Precise measurements of the temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background can be used to constrain the annihilation and decay of dark matter. In this work, we demonstrate via principal component analysis that the imprint of dark matter decay on the cosmic microwave background can be approximately parameterized by a single number for any given dark matter model. We develop a simple prescription for computing this model-dependent detectability factor, and demonstrate how this appro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
336
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
14
336
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our significance analysis, we find that the first three principal components have support primarily in the redshift range 10 3 < z < 10 4 . However, in contrast to the cases of DM annihilation [26] or decay [30], where the first principal component dominates and the space of perturbations to the CMB is approximately one dimensional, in both these cases the first principal component only accounts for about 40% of the variance. Thus the space of perturbations to the CMB from scattering is genuinely multidimensional.…”
Section: Early-universe Constraints On Darkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with our significance analysis, we find that the first three principal components have support primarily in the redshift range 10 3 < z < 10 4 . However, in contrast to the cases of DM annihilation [26] or decay [30], where the first principal component dominates and the space of perturbations to the CMB is approximately one dimensional, in both these cases the first principal component only accounts for about 40% of the variance. Thus the space of perturbations to the CMB from scattering is genuinely multidimensional.…”
Section: Early-universe Constraints On Darkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DM annihilation (e.g., Refs. [23][24][25][26][27]) or decay [28][29][30][31] to SM particles can inject energy into the photon-baryon fluid between recombination and reionization, heating and ionizing the hydrogen gas and changing the CMB anisotropy spectrum accordingly.…”
Section: Constraints From Anisotropies Of the Cosmic Microwave Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking α D α em and 1 = 10 −4 as above, m a 1 /m V 1 = 1/2, and m a 1 = 50 MeV one obtains Γ 6 ∼ 3 · 10 −51 MeV corresponding to a lifetime of ∼ 2 · 10 29 s which is a factor of ∼ 10 4 longer than the lower bound from the CMB [84] and ∼ 100 times longer than the tentative new limits from the 21 cm line 24 for this mass. Clearly a more detailed calculation of this partial width is warranted but this rough estimate indicates that the a 1 is very likely to be sufficiently long-lived in this setup to act as the DM without much impact on the analysis presented in the previous subsection.…”
Section: Jhep07(2018)118mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, the CMB bounds have been calculated in Ref. [65], which quantified the 95% confidence level lower bound on the lifetime for DM decaying into photons to be τ ∼ 10 24 s. This constraint can be directly converted into a bound relevant to our analysis, yielding …”
Section: Appendix: Expected Cmb Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%