2001
DOI: 10.1038/35093548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene-trap mutagenesis: past, present and beyond

Abstract: Although at least 35,000 human genes have been sequenced and mapped, adequate expression or functional information is available for only approximately 15% of them. Gene-trap mutagenesis is a technique that randomly generates loss-of-function mutations and reports the expression of many mouse genes. At present, several large-scale, gene-trap screens are being carried out with various new vectors, which aim to generate a public resource of mutagenized embryonic stem (ES) cells. This resource now includes more th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
273
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
273
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because large-scale phenotypedriven gene-trap screens are prohibitively laborious and costly, preselection of gene-trap events of interest is highly desirable. A number of expression-driven screening strategies have been designed to search for genes that are restricted to specific lineages, are responsive to external stimuli or encode secreted proteins 29 . But all these screens are confined to ES cells or their differentiated derivatives and rely on reporter expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because large-scale phenotypedriven gene-trap screens are prohibitively laborious and costly, preselection of gene-trap events of interest is highly desirable. A number of expression-driven screening strategies have been designed to search for genes that are restricted to specific lineages, are responsive to external stimuli or encode secreted proteins 29 . But all these screens are confined to ES cells or their differentiated derivatives and rely on reporter expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the possible routes to mutagenizing the mouse genome, gene-trapping vectors and chemical mutagenesis are being used on a large scale to provide a significant number of new mutants for gene function analysis (Hrabe de Angelis et al, 2000;Nolan et al, 2000;Stanford et al, 2001). An advantage of phenotype-based mutagenesis is that no assumptions are made about the possible function of the genes involved; instead we rely on sensitive phenotype analysis of individual animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A conventional gene-trap vector consists of a promoterless marker/reporter gene flanked by an upstream splice acceptor and a downstream poly(A) signal (Gossler et al, 1989;Stanford et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclear premRNA is then spliced to form a fusion transcript with the trapped exon immediately upstream of the insertion site. Since the processed fusion transcript encodes a truncated, often nonfunctional version of endogenous protein and the marker/ reporter, gene trapping is employed to elucidate gene functions by disrupting expression of trapped genes across a target genome (Stanford et al, 2001). During the past two decades, a number of gene-trap vectors have been successfully used for insertional mutagenesis and high-throughput screening of mutations in genes of embryonic stem cells (ESCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%