2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2007.70248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Clustering via Integrated Markov Models Combining Individual and Pairwise Features

Abstract: Abstract-Clustering of genes into groups sharing common characteristics is a useful exploratory technique for a number of subsequent computational analysis. A wide range of clustering algorithms have been proposed in particular to analyze gene expression data, but most of them consider genes as independent entities or include relevant information on gene interactions in a sub-optimal way.We propose a probabilistic model that has the advantage to account for individual data (eg. expression) and pairwise data (e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown to be more efficient than the most widely used clustering approaches on both simulated and real data (Celeux et al, 2003;Vignes and Forbes, 2007). This suggests good properties of convergence; local convergence of a very similar algorithm has been proven in Forbes and Fort (2007).…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown to be more efficient than the most widely used clustering approaches on both simulated and real data (Celeux et al, 2003;Vignes and Forbes, 2007). This suggests good properties of convergence; local convergence of a very similar algorithm has been proven in Forbes and Fort (2007).…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This latter method and many others have the drawback to consider gene measurements to be independent. Hence, we proposed in a previous publication (Vignes and Forbes, 2007) an extension of this approach to account for individual features (e.g., microarray data) and dependencies between genes in a united framework based on Hidden Markov Random Fields (HMRF).…”
Section: Blanchet and Vignesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous experience of using Markov random field (MRF) approach to image segmentation [53,54] and many others' successful applications of MRF [9,[55][56][57] suggest that the local characteristics of MRFs (also known as Markovianity) allow global optimization problems to be solved iteratively by taking local information into account. Suppose there are K classes of images in the subset, with the value of K unknown, and denote D = {d k |k = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional clustering methods such as hierarchical clustering [139], k-means algorithm [141], self-organizing map [334], principal component analysis [223], graph theoretical approaches [30,36,135,310,372,373,381,384], modelbased clustering [66,103,114,145,222,224,341,352,371,382,383], densitybased approaches [156], fuzzy clustering algorithms [50, 83,113], and rough-fuzzy clustering algorithms [212,213] group coexpressed genes from microarray data. Different supervised gene clustering algorithms are also developed in [84,136,204,205] to find coregulated gene clusters by incorporating the information of sample categories in gene clustering process.…”
Section: Introduction To Pattern Recognition and Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%