2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, farmers with blood relations (kinship) were likely to report both credit and food sharing links compared to their non-related counterparts. This finding is similar to that reported by Muange and Schwarze (2014) and Mekonnen, Gerber, and Matz (2016). Similarly, farmers whose farms bordered each other were more likely to mention a food link than their counterparts who did not share farm boundaries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, farmers with blood relations (kinship) were likely to report both credit and food sharing links compared to their non-related counterparts. This finding is similar to that reported by Muange and Schwarze (2014) and Mekonnen, Gerber, and Matz (2016). Similarly, farmers whose farms bordered each other were more likely to mention a food link than their counterparts who did not share farm boundaries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Gender difference was negatively correlated with existence of both credit and food sharing links, implying that farmers of the same gender are more likely to form both links than those of different gender. The results are supported by the findings of Van den Broeck and Dercon (2011) and Mekonnen, Gerber, and Matz (2016), but contradict the findings of De Weerdt and Fafchamps (2011). This contradiction could imply that the effects of gender on network formation depend on the type of network being studied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Agricultural extension is a major source of information but it is weak in many developing countries (Anderson & Feder 2007). Other sources of agricultural information and knowledge include informal channels such as social networks of neighbors and peers (Mekonnen et al, 2016). Social interactions become important in shaping production decisions in smallholder agriculture in the absence of extension services (Davis & Place, 2003).…”
Section: Social Interactions In Technology Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%