2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3053492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: for many thoughtful suggestions. Kevin Lai provided stellar research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that women are less proactive or hold themselves to a higher standard than men in other settings as well. For example, Chari & Goldsmith-Pinkham (2017) find that gender differences in submission rates of papers to the National Bureau of Economic Research's elite Summer Institute conference can explain the substantial gender gap among accepted authors. As a second example, Kolev, Fuentes-Medel & Murray (2019) find that the reason women score lower in blinded grant application evaluations is because they tend to use more narrow words, despite having better scientific output conditional on funding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that women are less proactive or hold themselves to a higher standard than men in other settings as well. For example, Chari & Goldsmith-Pinkham (2017) find that gender differences in submission rates of papers to the National Bureau of Economic Research's elite Summer Institute conference can explain the substantial gender gap among accepted authors. As a second example, Kolev, Fuentes-Medel & Murray (2019) find that the reason women score lower in blinded grant application evaluations is because they tend to use more narrow words, despite having better scientific output conditional on funding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agricultural economics profession broadly covers academic areas such as agricultural economics, food economics, agribusiness, and resource and environmental economics. EDI issues in these scholarly areas mirror those in the economics profession as a whole (Chari & Goldsmith‐Pinkham, 2017; Jacobson, 2018). The Northeastern Agricultural and Resources Economics Association (NAREA) is a regional scholarly society that is similar to the CAES in terms of broad academic areas, membership size, and associated annual operating budget.…”
Section: Why Does Caes Need An Edi Strategy and Action Plan?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two recent papers analyze gender differences in acceptance rates to economics conferences. While Chari and Goldsmith-Pinkham (2017) find no significant differences for NBER Summer Institute conferences, Hospido and Sanz (2019) find a significant gap for conferences in Europe. Boring (2017) and Mengel, Sauermann, and Zölitz (2019) both find evidence of female instructors receiving lower teaching evaluations (in a French and Dutch university, respectively), despite the fact that student performance on final tests is not affected by instructor gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%