2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in processing speed: A review of recent research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
72
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
15
72
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rushton and Jensen (2005) suggest that educational and cultural factors affect processing speed tasks less than they do other psychometric tasks; therefore, it is reasonable to think that cognitive factors lead to gender differences in processing speed tasks. However, the literature regarding processing speed does not seem to have uncovered any cognitive factors causing gender differences in processing speed (Roivainen, 2011). Putting aside the impact of factors contributing to gender differences in processing speed, our findings suggest that gender differences in basic abilities, such as processing speed, might lead to gender differences in other basic or higher order skills, too.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rushton and Jensen (2005) suggest that educational and cultural factors affect processing speed tasks less than they do other psychometric tasks; therefore, it is reasonable to think that cognitive factors lead to gender differences in processing speed tasks. However, the literature regarding processing speed does not seem to have uncovered any cognitive factors causing gender differences in processing speed (Roivainen, 2011). Putting aside the impact of factors contributing to gender differences in processing speed, our findings suggest that gender differences in basic abilities, such as processing speed, might lead to gender differences in other basic or higher order skills, too.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…One can come across several operational definitions of processing speed, such as the speed of paper-and-pencil coding, reaction time, finger tapping, and rapid naming of objects (Roivainen, 2011). One might also encounter various definitions and / or domains of creativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this view, whether reading speed is assessed as part of the letter detection task or with an independent reading task, it should correlate equally strongly with the missing-letter effect. With regard to sex differences, under this view, women should reliably produce a larger missing-letter effect than men because women are generally better and faster readers than men (see, e.g., Camarata & Woodcock, 2006;Roivainen, 2011). The lack of sex differences found in some previous studies could be due to the fact that undergraduate students constitute the bulk of participants used in experimental psychology, and this population is relatively homogeneous in terms of reading skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One likely candidate is reading skills. Specifically, although men have better visual-spatial skills than women, women are usually better readers (see, e.g., Camarata & Woodcock, 2006;Roivainen, 2011). In addition, according to the two dominant models of the missing-letter effect, reading rate is assumed to be the key reading skills component that would affect the missing-letter effect (Greenberg, Healy, Koriat, & Kreiner, 2004;Roy-Charland, Saint-Aubin, Klein, & Lawrence, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a male advantage has also been observed for tests of reaction time and finger tapping (Roivainen 2011).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Perceptual Motor Tasksmentioning
confidence: 80%