2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-012-0361-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in healthy life years within the EU: an exploration of the “health–survival” paradox

Abstract: ObjectivesTo evaluated the female–male health–survival paradox by estimating the contribution of women’s mortality advantage versus women’s disability disadvantage.MethodsDisability prevalence was measured from the 2006 Survey on Income and Living Conditions in 25 European countries. Disability prevalence was applied to life tables to estimate healthy life years (HLY) at age 15. Gender differences in HLY were split into two parts: that due to gender inequality in mortality and that due to gender inequality in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
131
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
12
131
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One is mechanical, since the number of proxies is lower on the male side (16.5 %, against 21.3 % for women). This confirms the well-known healthgender paradox, according to which women live longer than men but age with worse health (see Van Oyen et al 2013). Another explanation has more of a psychosocial nature, since experience in the field showed that wives often blocked phone calls, feeling the need to protect their husband (who were generally older than they were) from aggressive phone canvassing or suspected risks of invasion of privacy.…”
Section: Adaptations and The Inclusion Of Vulnerable Populationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…One is mechanical, since the number of proxies is lower on the male side (16.5 %, against 21.3 % for women). This confirms the well-known healthgender paradox, according to which women live longer than men but age with worse health (see Van Oyen et al 2013). Another explanation has more of a psychosocial nature, since experience in the field showed that wives often blocked phone calls, feeling the need to protect their husband (who were generally older than they were) from aggressive phone canvassing or suspected risks of invasion of privacy.…”
Section: Adaptations and The Inclusion Of Vulnerable Populationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although women live longer with activity limitations at ages 15 and 50, the gender gap in healthy life expectancy is smaller than the gender gap in life expectancy in most EU countries (Van Oyen et al 2010;Van Oyen et al 2012). These findings suggest that women may more likely to survive despite having disabilities and chronic conditions than men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several topics dominate contemporary research. In addition to gender differences in healthy and unhealthy length of life (Nusselder et al 2010;Van Oyen et al 2013;Crimmins, Kim, and Solé-Auró 2010;Luy and Minagawa 2014), particular attention is attributed to the 'male-female survival paradox': the observation that women live longer but their life without disabilities is shorter (Oksuzyan et al 2009). Another branch of research is directed towards country-level comparisons: Salomon et al (2012) report findings on 187 countries; Majer et al (2011), Jagger et al (2008, 2011), and Minagawa (2013 consider diverse groups of European countries.…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%