2007
DOI: 10.3386/w13638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Based Taxation and the Division of Family Chores

Abstract: Zeldes, seminar participants in many universities and our discussant, Stefania Albanesi, at the 2009 ASSA Meetings for helpful suggestions. The Editor (Alan Auerbach) and two anonymous referees provided very useful comments. Karabarbounis acknowledges financial support from the Neubauer Family Faculty Fund at Chicago Booth. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
135
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
135
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that our policy of gender-based family aid can be seen as being equivalent to a lower marginal tax rate for women, as it reduces the gap between the take-home pay of men and women. Our result hence differs from the argument made by Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis (2011) who propose different taxation for men and women. In their reasoning, the asymmetry across genders arises from women having a higher elasticity of labor supply than men.…”
Section: Propositioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our policy of gender-based family aid can be seen as being equivalent to a lower marginal tax rate for women, as it reduces the gap between the take-home pay of men and women. Our result hence differs from the argument made by Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis (2011) who propose different taxation for men and women. In their reasoning, the asymmetry across genders arises from women having a higher elasticity of labor supply than men.…”
Section: Propositioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there might be other factors left out of our investigation framework, which could play a role. Most importantly, the tax regime and the system of benefits are supposed to influence the labor market choices of lone individuals and individuals within couples (Alesina et al, 2009;Apps and Rees, 1999. Given the complexity of the issue, the theoretical discussion is still ongoing.…”
Section: Discussion and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology is similar to Gruber and Saez (2002) and Gelber (2014), and complements their work with a focus on home production, which offers a direct perspective on gender identity norms. To our knowledge, this analysis provides the first causal estimates of the impact of taxation on the household division of home production, an effect which has been theoretically studied by Alesina et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%