2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

geiger v2.0: an expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
712
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 841 publications
(754 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
712
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Diversifi cation rates -Th e rates reported in this study correspond to diff erent parts of the tree, known as breakpoints (e.g., nodes, stems, or both) that are evolving under diff erent parameter values, i.e., per-lineage net diversifi cation and relative extinction rates ( Pennell et al, 2014 ). Our analyses discovered six shift s in the rate of net diversifi cation ( r = speciation minus extinction) in the Rhinantheae clade when performed over the posterior distribution of trees; three of these were also identifi ed on the MCC tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diversifi cation rates -Th e rates reported in this study correspond to diff erent parts of the tree, known as breakpoints (e.g., nodes, stems, or both) that are evolving under diff erent parameter values, i.e., per-lineage net diversifi cation and relative extinction rates ( Pennell et al, 2014 ). Our analyses discovered six shift s in the rate of net diversifi cation ( r = speciation minus extinction) in the Rhinantheae clade when performed over the posterior distribution of trees; three of these were also identifi ed on the MCC tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversifi cation rates -Diversifi cation rate analyses were conducted on the same posterior distribution of 1000 trees, as well as on the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree using MEDUSA ( Alfaro et al, 2009 ), which is an extension of the method described by Rabosky et al (2007) and is available in the R package geiger 2.0 ( Pennell et al, 2014 ). Th e method used by Rabosky et al (2007) estimates two likelihoods for a dated tree: (1) a phylogenetic likelihood that uses the timing of the splits on the backbone to estimate ML values for birth and death rates following the equations of Nee et al (1994) , and (2) a taxonomic likelihood that uses species richness along with the date of the splits, estimating diversifi cation rates following Magallón and Sanderson (2001) .…”
Section: Divergence Time Estimation -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared divergence dates and ancestral placements between samples of 100 APT-dated MPTs to a random selection of 100 post-burn-in trees from the Bayesian analyses. We also used these samples to compare the outcomes of a comparative analysis, mimicking the analyses of [17], fitting models for Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU), early burst (EB), and Brownian motion (BM; via geiger [19]). Further details of our methods and convergence assessments for the tip-dating analyses are in the Methods section of the electronic supplementary material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, following Mi et al (2012), we estimated phylogenetic signal for OR to determine phylogenetic distinctiveness between exotic and native species. We used Pagel's k (Pagel, 1999) to estimate phylogenetic signal through the 'fitDiscrete()' function from the geiger package (Pennell et al, 2014). Pagel's k is a multiplier of the off-diagonal elements of a variance-covariance matrix, which best fits the distribution of data at the tips of the phylogeny.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Signal and Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%