The World Wide Web Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3308558.3313680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaps in Information Access in Social Networks?

Abstract: The study of influence maximization in social networks has largely ignored disparate effects these algorithms might have on the individuals contained in the social network. Individuals may place a high value on receiving information, e.g. job openings or advertisements for loans. While well-connected individuals at the center of the network are likely to receive the information that is being distributed through the network, poorly connected individuals are systematically less likely to receive the information,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the influence maximization paradigm has raised some ethical challenges. These challenges have very diverse objectives as limiting the spread of a "bad" campaign by starting the spreading of a "good" campaign blocking the first one (Budak, Agrawal, and El Abbadi 2011), maximizing social welfare by controlling the spread of multiple campaigns and orienting them towards the right agents (Borodin et al 2017) or minimizing the access gap between the highly connected individuals and the poorly connected ones (Fish et al 2019). We here focus on works that tackle algorithmically the challenges related to diversity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the influence maximization paradigm has raised some ethical challenges. These challenges have very diverse objectives as limiting the spread of a "bad" campaign by starting the spreading of a "good" campaign blocking the first one (Budak, Agrawal, and El Abbadi 2011), maximizing social welfare by controlling the spread of multiple campaigns and orienting them towards the right agents (Borodin et al 2017) or minimizing the access gap between the highly connected individuals and the poorly connected ones (Fish et al 2019). We here focus on works that tackle algorithmically the challenges related to diversity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These networks constitute a feedback channel and create an open culture for communication and knowledge exchange (Richter et al, 2016;Cetto et al, 2018). Because connections between individuals are as important as the individuals themselves, the opportunities that social networks offer to businesses increase their importance, especially for activities such as recruitment, marketing and business advancement or innovation (Fish et al, 2019). While explicit knowledge could be embedded in information repositories, tacit knowledge is embedded in the enterprise social networks, including the technology-enabled social networks that influence both individuals' emotional and behavioral reactions, which affect the performance outcomes.…”
Section: Croatian Information Technologies and Communication Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group fairness has been first studied by Tsang et al [29]. Similarly, the definition of diversity for access gap is first introduced by Fish et al [7] as an individual-level definition of fairness in IM. Balance constraint as two-stage problem is introduced in Gershtein et al [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%