1963
Functional Restoration in Tympanoplasty
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
85
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
8
0
1
Year Published
1964
2020
Publication Types
Select...
86
Relationship
1
85
Authors
Journals
Cited by 86 publications
(9 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
“…In two studies, the operation technique was described in a protocol. In the study of Brown, the elected surgical technique for cholesteatoma removal was the intact canal wall tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, as advocated by House and Sheehy . Only one of our included studies (Ajalloueyan) applied an obliteration technique, published previously by Quaranta et al In the remaining four studies, the operation protocols were not clearly defined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two studies, the operation technique was described in a protocol. In the study of Brown, the elected surgical technique for cholesteatoma removal was the intact canal wall tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, as advocated by House and Sheehy . Only one of our included studies (Ajalloueyan) applied an obliteration technique, published previously by Quaranta et al In the remaining four studies, the operation protocols were not clearly defined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be no argument that the Vllth nerve is at risk if its anatomy is not properly understood. Again, if the steps of the operation are not followed exactly_as described (Jansen, 1963;Sheehy, 1965;Smyth et ah, 1967) visualization of the junctional area between the mesotympanum and the attic and additus cannot be adequate "55 for the removal of ingrowing squamous epithelium. We maintain that if this visualization is achieved-and it can be routinely-the risks of leaving a viable squamous remnant behind will be no greater than in the socalled 'myringoplasty' operations which appear to be accepted without question in most major centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preservation or improvement of hearing is considered secondary 8 . Removal of only cholesteatoma without creating a radical cavity leaving behind the posterior wall intact is the choice as reported by House and Sheehy 9 . However, Shambugh 10 states that this procedure is suitable only for small sac cholesteatoma, not for an extensive cholesteatoma.…”
Section: Location Figure I: Operative Findings Of the Patients (N=80)mentioning
confidence: 99%
