2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11202388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Phenology of a Texas Post Oak Savanna from a CHRIS PROBA Time Series

Abstract: Remnant midwestern oak savannas in the USA have been altered by fire suppression and the encroachment of woody evergreen trees and shrubs. The Gus Engeling Wildlife Management Area (GEWMA) near Palestine, Texas represents a relatively intact southern example of thickening and evergreen encroachment in oak savannas. In this study, 18 images from the CHRIS/PROBA (Compact High-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer/Project for On-Board Autonomy) sensor were acquired between June 2009 and October 2010 and used to explore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[93], and used the overall coverage, NPP, biomass, etc., for aims such as determining grassland degradation [16] and estimating grass yield and rough protein content. Due to the wide application of high-resolution and hyperspectral remote sensing data, quantitative analysis of the spectral characteristics of different grassland species, and in-depth research on multitemporal monitoring of different vegetation indices [107][108][109][110], model parameters have been continuously optimized [11,12,14,20]. These parameters can be used to effectively identify different grassland types in the community, and determine the height, coverage, and area ratio of the grassland, thus providing complete monitoring of the succession processes of grassland communities.…”
Section: Research Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[93], and used the overall coverage, NPP, biomass, etc., for aims such as determining grassland degradation [16] and estimating grass yield and rough protein content. Due to the wide application of high-resolution and hyperspectral remote sensing data, quantitative analysis of the spectral characteristics of different grassland species, and in-depth research on multitemporal monitoring of different vegetation indices [107][108][109][110], model parameters have been continuously optimized [11,12,14,20]. These parameters can be used to effectively identify different grassland types in the community, and determine the height, coverage, and area ratio of the grassland, thus providing complete monitoring of the succession processes of grassland communities.…”
Section: Research Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are followed by two articles on African environments that include a mix of savannas and woodlands and other vegetation [27,28]. The final two articles address functional ecological aspects of two different types of northern hemisphere oak savannas in North America [29] and Europe [30]. The group of four papers on South America span the ecotone from the heavily altered Mato Grosso forests in Amazonia through the savanna of the Cerrado to the dry forests of the Caatinga.…”
Section: The Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two articles published here represent two major types: the perennial grass/oak savannas that stretched from southern Canada to northern Mexico between the grasslands and forests of North America; and the annual grass/oak savannas found, for example, in California and Spain. The paper by Hill et al [29] describes the use of a rare time series from the CHRIS hyperspectral sensor to explore functional phenology of the woody canopy in a conserved but degraded post oak savanna in Texas invaded with evergreen shrubs. The results of this study hint at the value of hyperspectral data in characterization of differences in canopy properties and species mixtures that are important in the evolution of disturbed remnant landscapes.…”
Section: The Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the time the data was acquired, these differences a reflective of the different vegetation structure (sparse vs closed canopy) or phenological stages (leaf-on vs leaf-off) in the two sites. The data for the Zambia site was acquired in June, which is a leaf-off period for most deciduous forest in Zambia while Texas forests were in their leaf-off state at the time the data was acquired in April [21,22].…”
Section: Photon Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%