“…Conventionally, this has involved culturing primary human hepatocytes or immortalized/cancer-derived cell lines as 2D monolayers. However, the cells used in these models will often be phenotypically different from in-vivo hepatocytes (i.e., Ammonia metabolism/urea secretion is higher in spheroids (73) Gene expression is higher and/or maintained for longer for a number of phase I proteins in spheroid cultures (68,141,144) Activity for CYP450 enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism is higher and /or maintained for longer in spheroids (71,73,89,141) Protein expression for a number of phase I, II, and III proteins is maintained for longer in spheroids (71) CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4 more inducible to known pharmacological inducers (89) Gene expression for phase II and III proteins, nuclear receptors, and hepatocyte markers is higher and/or maintained for longer in spheroids (141,144) GSTP1 gene expression lower in spheroids (141) CYP4A11 and SLC27A5 expression lost more rapidly in spheroids (71) Lower protein expression for some basolateral transporters in spheroids (71) Proteomic and metabolite profile is more stable in 3D cultures over time (71,141) Spheroid cultures have greater sensitivity to detect toxicity for known hepatotoxic compounds at toxicologically relevant concentrations (71,73,81) Spheroid cultures show greater recovery from the dedifferentiation process associated with in-vitro culture, when considering gene expression (74) cancer-derived cell lines), or rapidly dedifferentiate, becoming metabolically incompetent, when cultured in vitro (i.e., PHH). This hinders their ability to investigate metabolism-dependent toxicities and limits their application for detecting DILI-positive compounds, particularly over chronic and repeat dose time courses that are more emulative of in-vivo manifestations of DILI.…”