2018
DOI: 10.1101/285296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FUN-LOV: Fungal LOV domains for optogenetic control of gene expression and flocculation in yeast

Abstract: Optogenetic switches permit accurate control of gene expression upon light stimulation. These synthetic switches have become a powerful tool for gene regulation, allowing modulation of customized phenotypes, overcoming the obstacles of chemical inducers and replacing their use by an inexpensive resource: light. In this work, we implemented FUN-LOV; an optogenetic switch based on the photon-regulated interaction of WC-1 and VVD, two LOV (Light Oxygen Voltage) blue-light photoreceptors from the fungus Neurospora… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only certain co-cultures at 1:1 ratio and exposed to BL showed activation of the normalized response during the first 10 h, which did not occur for the same cell mixtures grown in DD (Figure 4). Specifically, co-cultures involving R2 reached peaks between 3.5 and 4 h. On the other hand, the kinetics of cell mixtures involving R3 were slower, exhibiting the greatest values between 9 and 9.5 h. Interestingly, these maximum levels were similar to those ones obtained in BL for direct optogenetic control of a chromosomal luciferase using the FUN-LOV switch 50 . Although blue-light is the stimulus that triggers the split genetic circuit that leads to luciferase induction in the R-strains, the response of the system was surprisingly higher when examining co-cultures going through an illumination transition such as DL4h:20h, compared to ones grown in BL (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only certain co-cultures at 1:1 ratio and exposed to BL showed activation of the normalized response during the first 10 h, which did not occur for the same cell mixtures grown in DD (Figure 4). Specifically, co-cultures involving R2 reached peaks between 3.5 and 4 h. On the other hand, the kinetics of cell mixtures involving R3 were slower, exhibiting the greatest values between 9 and 9.5 h. Interestingly, these maximum levels were similar to those ones obtained in BL for direct optogenetic control of a chromosomal luciferase using the FUN-LOV switch 50 . Although blue-light is the stimulus that triggers the split genetic circuit that leads to luciferase induction in the R-strains, the response of the system was surprisingly higher when examining co-cultures going through an illumination transition such as DL4h:20h, compared to ones grown in BL (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…FUN-LOV, an optogenetic switch we recently described by exploiting the blue-light dependent interaction between WC-1 and VVD photoreceptors from the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, has enabled a fine temporal resolution of transcriptional control yielding a broad range of expression in yeast 50 . In this work, we used this switch to implement a light-inducible intercellular system based on two yeast strains (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Optogenetics is based on photosensitive proteins known as photoreceptors, which are capable of light sensing at different wavelengths (Losi et al, 2018;Tang et al, 2021). Currently, optogenetic tools include a large set of different photoreceptors, which have been implemented in a variety of biological platforms (Kolar et al, 2018), including microorganisms such as the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Salinas et al, 2017;Figueroa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%