2021
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9102122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Short- to Long-Term Effects of C-Section Delivery on Microbiome Establishment and Host Health

Abstract: The establishment of gut microbiota has been proven to be impacted by several factors during pregnancy, delivery, and neonate periods. The body of evidence describing C-section delivery (CSD) as one of the most disruptive events during early life has expanded in recent years, concluding that CSD results in a drastic change in microbiota establishment patterns. When comparing the gut microbiota composition of CSD babies with vaginally delivered (VD) babies, the former show a microbiome that closely resembles th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, various epidemiological studies have established statistical associations between early alteration of the intestinal microbiota and the subsequent occurrence of particular pathophysiologies (reviewed by Blottière et al, 2013;Tamburini et al, 2016;Milani et al, 2017;Stinson, 2020). It has been documented in particular in the case of birth by CS (Korpela, 2021;Ríos-Covian et al, 2021) and perinatal antibiotic therapies (Azad et al, 2017;Aires, 2021), but these associations should be viewed with caution due to the possibility of biases relating to reverse causalities and the fact that the repercussions of CS are not limited to modulation of the microbiota (King, 2021). Interventional studies on animal models are more convincing in this respect; to date, several studies have demonstrated associations between early microbiotal perturbations and subsequent physiological consequences (e.g., Cox et al, 2014or Pocheron et al, 2021, demonstrating the need to consider early microbiota alterations in the DOHAD process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this regard, various epidemiological studies have established statistical associations between early alteration of the intestinal microbiota and the subsequent occurrence of particular pathophysiologies (reviewed by Blottière et al, 2013;Tamburini et al, 2016;Milani et al, 2017;Stinson, 2020). It has been documented in particular in the case of birth by CS (Korpela, 2021;Ríos-Covian et al, 2021) and perinatal antibiotic therapies (Azad et al, 2017;Aires, 2021), but these associations should be viewed with caution due to the possibility of biases relating to reverse causalities and the fact that the repercussions of CS are not limited to modulation of the microbiota (King, 2021). Interventional studies on animal models are more convincing in this respect; to date, several studies have demonstrated associations between early microbiotal perturbations and subsequent physiological consequences (e.g., Cox et al, 2014or Pocheron et al, 2021, demonstrating the need to consider early microbiota alterations in the DOHAD process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to keep in mind that the evolution of the microbiota takes place at the same time as the intestinal maturation process, which affects both the immune and epithelial components of the colon, both of which are involved in the control of bacteria engraftment (Biol-N'garagba and Louisot, 2003;Zhang et al, 2015). As intestinal maturation can be reversibly influenced by the presence of bacteria (for reviews, see Ríos-Covian et al, 2021;Sarkar et al, 2021), its modulation by early settlers may -beyond constituting mechanisms for the possible role of early microbiota perturbations as a relay for later physiological consequences (not discussed here) -as well contribute to priority effects. Note that the maturation of these two tissues is otherwise paramount for the microbiome differences associated with newborn gestational age.…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Priority Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been shown that meconium from full-term newborns is not sterile and that the bacteria present in it are also present in the amniotic fluid, vagina, and oral cavity [11]. Colonization also occurs at the time of childbirth: in the case of natural birth, the gastrointestinal tract of the newborn contains bacteria that live in the gastrointestinal tract and vagina of the mother, while in newborns born by caesarean section, the bacterial flora contains bacteria inhabiting the mother's skin, so they have a smaller number of bacteria of the type Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides and more pathogenic Enterococcus, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella [26,27]. Following delivery, the diet is one of the main factors that modulates the gut microbiota of infants.…”
Section: The Importance Of Microbiota For Human Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 Loss of these early-life microbial contacts, often caused by antibiotic misuse or cesarean section birth, can trigger an imbalance between the microbiota and a loss of microbial diversity, known as dysbiosis, and immunological aberrations that predispose children to allergies and asthma. 5 , 10 , 11 Conversely, restoring this microbial imbalance via therapeutic applications of probiotics, which are nutritional supplements containing health-promoting microbes, has yielded promising results in the management of allergy and asthma symptoms. 12 These promising scientific observations together with clinical evidence may reveal a previously unexplored role of the microbiome in immune-mediated diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%