2011
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2010.539597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From romance to rocket science: speed dating in higher education

Abstract: This article is the first comprehensive review of speed dating in the tertiary sector. While speed dating has its origins as a networking technique to connect singles, it has only more recently made its way into the academy. Since 2005 universities world-wide have begun to adopt speed dating protocols as a tool for building research culture. An extensive review of the brief history of speed dating in university settings indicates that the motivation for organising events tends to fall into six clusters. Each m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On that day, each student presents a 2-min speech pitching a line of research. Students then participate in a speed-dating activity (Muurlink & Poyatos Matas, 2011), with the goal of finding a partner and a topic. Typically, pairs form organically, although oftentimes students compromised to select what academic conversation they would join.…”
Section: Stage 2: What Conversation Should I Join? Find a Topic And A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On that day, each student presents a 2-min speech pitching a line of research. Students then participate in a speed-dating activity (Muurlink & Poyatos Matas, 2011), with the goal of finding a partner and a topic. Typically, pairs form organically, although oftentimes students compromised to select what academic conversation they would join.…”
Section: Stage 2: What Conversation Should I Join? Find a Topic And A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although speed-dating formats were originally introduced for romantic purposes, their possibilities for implementation have been broadened to several different application contexts. Examples include technology transfer in fragmented regional innovation systems [31], student-driven feedback and engagement [32], conveying science from scientists to journalists [33], a tool for building research culture [34] customerto-customer interactions [35], and others. The advantage of these one-to-one encounters is that the dialogue partners can better understand the level of knowledge of their respective counterparts and respond to it, thus preventing intimidation of the partner due to knowledge differences [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%