2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.064301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From quantum-mechanical to classical dynamics in the central-spin model

Abstract: We discuss the semiclassical and classical character of the dynamics of a single spin 1/2 coupled to a bath of noninteracting spins 1/2. On the semiclassical level, we extend our previous approach presented in D. Stanek, C. Raas, and G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155305 (2013) by the explicit consideration of the conservation of the total spin. On the classical level, we compare the results of the classical equations of motions in absence and presence of an external field to the full quantum result obtained by… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice one must average over an appropriate large number of configurations of the random fields. About 10 6 simulations are enough to reduce the relative statistical error below 10 −3 as expected [23]. This, however, limits the number of bath spins that can be treated in the classical simulation to about 1000.…”
Section: ŝmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice one must average over an appropriate large number of configurations of the random fields. About 10 6 simulations are enough to reduce the relative statistical error below 10 −3 as expected [23]. This, however, limits the number of bath spins that can be treated in the classical simulation to about 1000.…”
Section: ŝmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Besides the already mentioned Bethe ansatz, exact diagonalization [6,17], Chebyshev expansion (CE) [18][19][20], or a direct evolution of the density matrices via the Liouvillean [21] can be used for small systems of about 20 spins, but up to long times. Density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) can tackle much larger systems up to about 1000 spins, but is restricted to short times up to about 40 /J Q [22][23][24]. The strict limit of infinite times, i.e., of persisting correlations has been tackled by mathematically rigorous bounds [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative promising approaches towards calculation of the central-spin-model dynamics have been proposed, such as diagrammatic perturbation theory [51], exact time evolution [66], density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) methods [49,52,67], Monte Carlo methods [34], and approaches employing conserved quantities [68,69]. Each of these methods should be scrutinized as to how well they are suited and capable of capturing the mode locking effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also show the uncertainty in each of the three components O 52]. But here, we cannot apply a semiclassical approach, because the uncertainty defines a coarser frequency scale than the peak structure we desire to resolve.…”
Section: Transverse Components Of the Overhauser Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Overhauser field caused by the hyperfine interaction with the nuclear spins is normally distributed so that its probability distribution has the form [23][24][25]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%