2012
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Objects to Landmarks: The Function of Visual Location Information in Spatial Navigation

Abstract: Landmarks play an important role in guiding navigational behavior. A host of studies in the last 15 years has demonstrated that environmental objects can act as landmarks for navigation in different ways. In this review, we propose a parsimonious four-part taxonomy for conceptualizing object location information during navigation. We begin by outlining object properties that appear to be important for a landmark to attain salience. We then systematically examine the different functions of objects as navigation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
94
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(149 reference statements)
8
94
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Objects rated as more stable (larger and less “portable”) automatically evoked landmark-based neural processes in the study subjects [65]. In line with this, it has also been shown that making spatial judgments with reference to stable environmental objects (e.g., a large buildings) compared with unstable objects (e.g., a ball) elicit greater activity in navigationally relevant medial parietal and temporal brain regions, including the hippocampus (for review see [66], [67]). Objects included in our FLI test fulfil both of these criteria (shape uniqueness and stability) hence could be relevant for testing one part of complex spatial navigation behaviour used in.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Objects rated as more stable (larger and less “portable”) automatically evoked landmark-based neural processes in the study subjects [65]. In line with this, it has also been shown that making spatial judgments with reference to stable environmental objects (e.g., a large buildings) compared with unstable objects (e.g., a ball) elicit greater activity in navigationally relevant medial parietal and temporal brain regions, including the hippocampus (for review see [66], [67]). Objects included in our FLI test fulfil both of these criteria (shape uniqueness and stability) hence could be relevant for testing one part of complex spatial navigation behaviour used in.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…During navigation, we not only use visual landmarks to guide our behavior (Chan, Baumann, Bellgrove, & Mattingley, 2013;Yoder, Benjamin, & Taube, 2011) but also call upon affective experiences that provide implicit cues about potential risks associated with visiting locations at which negative events occurred previously. Our results reveal that parahippocampal place memory is automatically enhanced for places consistently associated with negative affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Route-choice is a critical component of any pedestrian model, as it describes the dynamic process through which people move through a scene, making and reassessing decisions as time progresses and scene traffic changes with it. Route choice is an active area of research which spans multiple disciplines such as psychology [66,67], geography [3], engineering [68,69], computer graphics [70,71], to name but a few. Computationally, this is a challenging issue, both in terms of theoretical and practical problems associated with describing pedestrian behavior.…”
Section: The Scene-and Activity-aware Agent-based Model (Sa 2 -Abm)mentioning
confidence: 99%