2015
DOI: 10.3390/s150818360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Laser Scanning to Finite Element Analysis of Complex Buildings by Using a Semi-Automatic Procedure

Abstract: In this paper, a new semi-automatic procedure to transform three-dimensional point clouds of complex objects to three-dimensional finite element models is presented and validated. The procedure conceives of the point cloud as a stacking of point sections. The complexity of the clouds is arbitrary, since the procedure is designed for terrestrial laser scanner surveys applied to buildings with irregular geometry, such as historical buildings. The procedure aims at solving the problems connected to the generation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
93
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3D documentation of CH has been extensively improved through active sensors or passive approaches but the models are not suitable for being directly exploited in FEA. Different approaches have been followed in order to generate the volumetric mesh from the acquired 3D point cloud: a) redrawing with a CAD modeller a new model using the 3D mesh (Brune et al, 2012); b) using directly the triangular mesh generated by the 3D capturing pipeline (Castellazzi et al, 2015) c) generating a volumetric mesh directly from the point cloud (Shapiro et al, 2011;Bitelli et al, 2016). One of the solutions to use realitybased 3D models results in a strong simplification of the mesh associated to a topological rearrangement of it, obtained by using retopology that involves the creation of a new topology for a 3D model.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D documentation of CH has been extensively improved through active sensors or passive approaches but the models are not suitable for being directly exploited in FEA. Different approaches have been followed in order to generate the volumetric mesh from the acquired 3D point cloud: a) redrawing with a CAD modeller a new model using the 3D mesh (Brune et al, 2012); b) using directly the triangular mesh generated by the 3D capturing pipeline (Castellazzi et al, 2015) c) generating a volumetric mesh directly from the point cloud (Shapiro et al, 2011;Bitelli et al, 2016). One of the solutions to use realitybased 3D models results in a strong simplification of the mesh associated to a topological rearrangement of it, obtained by using retopology that involves the creation of a new topology for a 3D model.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this procedure, with all its accuracy limitations, can be applied to CH buildings because the geometry of the structure can be replicated through a CAD drawing using profiles, cannot be instead used for statues, whose geometry is more complex and that cannot be simplified through elements as bean, truss or shell, used for the modelling in FEA. The second approach has a range of slightly different methods: i) bare simplification of the triangular surface mesh before converting it in a volumetric one, that may give significant deviations between the actual shape and the simulated one (Riccardelli et al, 2014); ii) the simplified description of the shape through a set of profiles that are then discretized for generating a limited number of nodes, for creating a reliable low resolution representation of the interior and the exterior of a structure, from which produce a volumetric model (Castellazzi et al, 2015); iii) the fitting of the acquired model with a parametric model suitable to be converted in volumetric mesh (Bassier et al, 2016). Finally, the last approach does not even pass from the mesh, generating a volumetric approximation of the shape from the raw 3D cloud of points (Shapiro and Tsukanov, 1999), later compared by the same authors to the other approaches (Freytag et al, 2011;Shapiro et al, 2011).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed procedure can take benefit from a very detailed Finite Element (FE) numerical model (see Figure 5). This latter was developed starting from the data acquired from a laser scanner survey and by means of a non-standard mesh generation procedure called CLOUD2FEM, conceived and set up by part of the authors in ( [4], [8]). Such an original procedure semi-automatically transforms 3D points cloud of complex geometries in 3D FE models, keeping low the user-time demand with respect to traditional CAD-based routines.…”
Section: Application Of the Proposed Procedures To The Case Study Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%