1999
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Individuals to Aggregations: the Interplay between Behavior and Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
259
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
259
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lagrangian approach treats each organism as a particle obeying a nonlinear difference or differential equation (Sakai, 1973;Suzuki and Sakai, 1973;Okubo et al, 1977;Vicsek et al, 1995;Levine et al, 2001;Schweitzer et al, 2001;Couzin et al, 2002;Erdmann et al, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003;Aldana and Huepe, 2003;Erdmann and Ebeling, 2003;Mogilner et al, 2003). Alternatively, the Eulerian approach describes the local flux of individuals with an advectiondiffusion equation for a continuum population density field (Kawasaki, 1978;Okubo, 1980;Mimura and Yamaguti, 1982;Passo and Demottoni, 1984;Ikeda, 1984;Alt, 1985;Ikeda, 1985;Satsuma and Mimura, 1985;Ikeda and Nagai, 1987;Hosono and Mimura, 1989;Grünbaum and Okubo, 1994;Edelstein-Keshet et al, 1998;Toner and Tu, 1998;Flierl et al, 1999;Mogilner and Edelstein-Keshet, 1999;Topaz and Bertozzi, 2004). A variety of methods can be used to connect the two formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lagrangian approach treats each organism as a particle obeying a nonlinear difference or differential equation (Sakai, 1973;Suzuki and Sakai, 1973;Okubo et al, 1977;Vicsek et al, 1995;Levine et al, 2001;Schweitzer et al, 2001;Couzin et al, 2002;Erdmann et al, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003;Aldana and Huepe, 2003;Erdmann and Ebeling, 2003;Mogilner et al, 2003). Alternatively, the Eulerian approach describes the local flux of individuals with an advectiondiffusion equation for a continuum population density field (Kawasaki, 1978;Okubo, 1980;Mimura and Yamaguti, 1982;Passo and Demottoni, 1984;Ikeda, 1984;Alt, 1985;Ikeda, 1985;Satsuma and Mimura, 1985;Ikeda and Nagai, 1987;Hosono and Mimura, 1989;Grünbaum and Okubo, 1994;Edelstein-Keshet et al, 1998;Toner and Tu, 1998;Flierl et al, 1999;Mogilner and Edelstein-Keshet, 1999;Topaz and Bertozzi, 2004). A variety of methods can be used to connect the two formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation of organisms is one of the topics widely researched through this line (see Ref. [16] for a review). In some cases the nonlocality arises from the type of motion of the individuals, such as in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation biology has raised many new problems, including those associated with the design of nature reserves, and the fascinating subject of collective motion has attracted the attention of biologists, mathematicians and physicists alike [6,21]. Substantive mathematical problems remain, like the problem of scaling from the microscopic to the macroscopic, marrying the Lagrangian and Eulerian perspectives [8]. All of these issues are evident in the broad scope of the papers in this volume.…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] considers how the properties of individual movement can be scaled up to the population level. It starts with a review of mathematical models of self-organized population patterning with an emphasis on interaction and communication between the individuals (Chap.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%