2017
DOI: 10.1093/jue/jux009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From fear to understanding: changes in media representations of leopard incidences after media awareness workshops in Mumbai, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, this included framing many human-bear interactions as "conflicts," despite a lack of imminent threat to humans. Indeed, human-bear conflict stories were over-reported compared to other narratives, where a single incidence garnered more attention over communicating factual information or peaceful human-bear interactions (Cohen & Richardson, 2002;Hathaway et al, 2017;Muter et al, 2009;Sakurai et al, 2013). It also appeared as though several grand narratives were used by the news media to resonate with the public, who may be eager to consume and internalize sensational bear stories (Bombieri et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, this included framing many human-bear interactions as "conflicts," despite a lack of imminent threat to humans. Indeed, human-bear conflict stories were over-reported compared to other narratives, where a single incidence garnered more attention over communicating factual information or peaceful human-bear interactions (Cohen & Richardson, 2002;Hathaway et al, 2017;Muter et al, 2009;Sakurai et al, 2013). It also appeared as though several grand narratives were used by the news media to resonate with the public, who may be eager to consume and internalize sensational bear stories (Bombieri et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This eco-gossip, with very predictable and clear protagonists and antagonists and the occasional man-bites-bear surprise, appears to be the diet of manufactured information fed to the public (Boan, Malcolm, Vanier, Euler, & Moola, 2018). Repetitious and negative storylines like these undoubtedly have the power to influence public perceptions about bears by unrealistically elevating risk perception among the public, and perhaps hampering conservation efforts or polarizing conservation debates (Bombieri et al, 2018;Bornatowski, Hussey, Sampio, & Barreto, 2019;Hathaway et al, 2017;Kaczensky et al, 2001;Sabatier & Huveneers, 2018;Stoddard & MacDonald, 2011). So while the journalistic principles of objectivity, fairness, accuracy and balance should be espoused by journalists and news editors, the reality may be if it bleeds, it leads (Boykoff & Boykoff, 2007;Stoop, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, media workshops tailored to desensationalize the coverage of negative human‐leopard conflicts have proven effective in Mumbai (Hathaway et al. ). Similarly, an efficient assessment of salient topics could be a first step to increase the effectiveness of new community engagement programs by improving our ability to align practices with current conditions (Slagle et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because media can play an influential role in shaping support for different conservation strategies (Enck & Brown 2002;Serfass et al 2014), identifying how issues are framed can be useful in developing new media relation plans to promote productive dialogue supporting coexistence (Siemer et al 2007). For example, media workshops tailored to desensationalize the coverage of negative human-leopard conflicts have proven effective in Mumbai (Hathaway et al 2017). Similarly, an efficient assessment of salient topics could be a first step to increase the effectiveness of new community engagement programs by improving our ability to align practices with current conditions (Slagle et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that emotional feelings toward wildlife are, indeed, in-born (Strommen, 1995;Davey et al, 1998;Prokop & Tunnicliffe, 2008;DeLoache, Pickard, & LoBue, 2010), often recurring with striking similarities across diverse cultural settings (Davey et al, 1998). As a direct consequence, animals-related emotions end up playing a key role in scientific and socio-political debates around both the management and conservation of wildlife (Jones, 2006;Singh, 2009;Frank, Johansson, & Flykt, 2015;Zainal Abidin & Jacobs, 2019;Drijfhout, Kendal, & Green, 2020;Straka, Miller, & Jacobs, 2020), and in the perception of risk (Knopff, Knopff, & St. Clair, 2016;Hathaway et al, 2017;Bombieri et al, 2018;Nanni et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%