2005
DOI: 10.1080/0140238042000297080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Catch-all Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
112
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Established parties are said to have formed a cartel on the market for votes to exploit the resources provided by the state, and hence exclude newcomers from representation (cf. Detterbeck 2005;Blyth and Katz 2005;Katz and Mair 1995). In fact, Lipset and Rokkan's (1967, p. 61) own attempt to explain the freezing process resembles this argument.…”
Section: The Problem Of Having Well Established and Powerful Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Established parties are said to have formed a cartel on the market for votes to exploit the resources provided by the state, and hence exclude newcomers from representation (cf. Detterbeck 2005;Blyth and Katz 2005;Katz and Mair 1995). In fact, Lipset and Rokkan's (1967, p. 61) own attempt to explain the freezing process resembles this argument.…”
Section: The Problem Of Having Well Established and Powerful Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Scholars claim that increasingly, 'public policy is less of a governmental dictum and more of an ongoing negotiation among government and non-government actors (Katz & Mair, 1995;Castells, 1996;Blumler and Kavanagh, 1999;Ornstein and Mann, 2000;Bingham et al, 2005a;Blyth and Katz, 2005)' (Crozier, 2008 p. 3). While Crozier makes an empirical claim, other scholars soften the claim arguing, 'the idea of a sovereign state that governs society topdown through laws, rules and detailed regulations has lost its grip and is being replaced by new ideas about a decentred governance based on interdependence, negotiation and trust' (Sørensen & Torfing, 2005, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than compete for the favours of the voters, they may carve up the benefits of a political system between themselves (Katz and Mair 1995;Blyth and Katz 2005). They may fail to form even where there is an identifiable group capable of being represented (Olson 1965); or they may fail to supply choices in relation to a particular level of government.…”
Section: Introduction Parties and Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%